The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic Changes in Resynthesized Brassica napus and Their Effect on Gene Expression and Phenotype
Open accessAbstract
Many previous studies have provided evidence for genome changes in polyploids, but there are little data on the overall population dynamics of genome change and whether it causes phenotypic variability. We analyzed genetic, epigenetic, gene expression, and phenotypic changes in ∼50 resynthesized Brassica napus lines independently derived by hybridizing double haploids of Brassica oleracea and Brassica rapa. A previous analysis of the first generation (S0) found that genetic changes were rare, and cytosine methylation changes were frequent. Our analysis of a later generation found that most S0 methylation changes remained fixed in their S5 progeny, although there were some reversions and new methylation changes. Genetic changes were much more frequent in the S5 generation, occurring in every line with lines normally distributed for number of changes. Genetic changes were detected on 36 of the 38 chromosomes of the S5 allopolyploids and were not random across the genome. DNA fragment losses within lines often occurred at linked marker loci, and most fragment losses co-occurred with intensification of signal from homoeologous markers, indicating that the changes were due to homoeologous nonreciprocal transpositions (HNRTs). HNRTs between chromosomes A1 and C1 initiated in early generations, occurred in successive generations, and segregated, consistent with a recombination mechanism. HNRTs and deletions were correlated with qualitative changes in the expression of specific homoeologous genes and anonymous cDNA amplified fragment length polymorphisms and with phenotypic variation among S5 polyploids. Our data indicate that exchanges among homoeologous chromosomes are a major mechanism creating novel allele combinations and phenotypic variation in newly formed B. napus polyploids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
PATHWAYS, MECHANISMS, AND RATES OF POLYPLOID FORMATION IN FLOWERING PLANTS
Ramsey, J., & Schemske, D. W. (1998) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467 · Cited by 1,934
Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms
Masterson, J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.264.5157.421 · Cited by 1,176
Neopolyploidy in Flowering Plants
Ramsey, J., & Schemske, D. W. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437 · Cited by 1,053
Song, K., Lu, P., Tang, K., & Osborn, T. C. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.17.7719 · Cited by 1,019
Self-citationPolyploidy and Novelty in Flowering Plants
Levin, D. A. (1983) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284115 · Cited by 1,005
Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids
Osborn, T. C., Chris Pires, J., Birchler, J. A., Auger, D. L., Jeffery Chen, Z., Lee, H.-S., Comai, L., Madlung, A., Doerge, R. W., Colot, V., et al. (2003) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(03)00015-5 · Cited by 910
Self-citationBachem, C. W. B., Van Der Hoeven, R. S., De Bruijn, S. M., Vreugdenhil, D., Zabeau, M., & Visser, R. G. F. (1996) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.9050745.x · Cited by 853
Wendel, J. F., Schnabel, A., & Seelanan, T. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.1.280 · Cited by 828
Adams, K. L., Cronn, R., Percifield, R., & Wendel, J. F. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0630618100 · Cited by 825
Cited by
Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants
Soltis, P. S., Marchant, D. B., Van de Peer, Y., & Soltis, D. E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.003 · Cited by 773
The polyploidy revolution then…and now: Stebbins revisited
Soltis, D. E., Visger, C. J., & Soltis, P. S. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400178 · Cited by 517
Doubling down on genomes: Polyploidy and crop plants
Renny‐Byfield, S., & Wendel, J. F. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400119 · Cited by 406
Hybridization in Plants: Old Ideas, New Techniques
Goulet, B. E., Roda, F., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.01340 · Cited by 355
Genomic Clues to the Evolutionary Success of Polyploid Plants
Hegarty, M. J., & Hiscock, S. J. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.043 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaeta, R. T., Pires, J. C., Iniguez-Luy, F., Leon, E., & Osborn, T. C.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3403-3417
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2014094496
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 43.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Changes in Resynthesized Brassica napus and Their Effect on Gene Expression and Phenotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.107.054346
- The paper
- Gaeta, R. T., Pires, J. C., Iniguez-Luy, F., Leon, E., & Osborn, T. C. (2007). Genomic Changes in Resynthesized Brassica napus and Their Effect on Gene Expression and Phenotype. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.054346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.