The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-Wide Analysis of mRNA Decay Rates and Their Determinants in Arabidopsis thaliana
Open accessAbstract
To gain a global view of mRNA decay in Arabidopsis thaliana, suspension cell cultures were treated with a transcriptional inhibitor, and microarrays were used to measure transcript abundance over time. The deduced mRNA half-lives varied widely, from minutes to >24 h. Three features of the transcript displayed a correlation with decay rates: (1) genes possessing at least one intron produce mRNA transcripts significantly more stable than those of intronless genes, and this was not related to overall length, sequence composition, or number of introns; (2) various sequence elements in the 3′ untranslated region are enriched among short- and long-lived transcripts, and their multiple occurrence suggests combinatorial control of transcript decay; and (3) transcripts that are microRNA targets generally have short half-lives. The decay rate of transcripts correlated with subcellular localization and function of the encoded proteins. Analysis of transcript decay rates for genes encoding orthologous proteins between Arabidopsis, yeast, and humans indicated that yeast and humans had a higher percentage of transcripts with shorter half-lives and that the relative stability of transcripts from genes encoding proteins involved in cell cycle, transcription, translation, and energy metabolism is conserved. Comparison of decay rates with changes in transcript abundance under a variety of abiotic stresses reveal that a set of transcription factors are downregulated with similar kinetics to decay rates, suggesting that inhibition of their transcription is an important early response to abiotic stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The highways and byways of mRNA decay
Garneau, N. L., Wilusz, J., & Wilusz, C. J. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2104 · Cited by 1,294
Cited by
Sharova, L. V., Sharov, A. A., Nedorezov, T., Piao, Y., Shaik, N., & Ko, M. S. H. (2009) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsn030 · Cited by 591
Conserved principles of mammalian transcriptional regulation revealed by RNA half-life
Friedel, C. C., Dölken, L., Ruzsics, Z., Koszinowski, U. H., & Zimmer, R. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp542 · Cited by 230
Matiolli, C. C., Tomaz, J. P., Duarte, G. T., Prado, F. M., Del Bem, L. E. V., Silveira, A. B., Gauer, L., Corrêa, L. G. G., Drumond, R. D., Viana, A. J. C., et al. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.181743 · Cited by 120
Ferizi, M., Aneja, M. K., Balmayor, E. R., Badieyan, Z. S., Mykhaylyk, O., Rudolph, C., & Plank, C. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39149 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Narsai, R., Howell, K. A., Millar, A. H., O'Toole, N., Small, I., & Whelan, J.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3418-3436
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2171356375
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.