Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes

Open access
Paterson, Andrew H., Bowers, John E., Burow, Mark D., Draye, Xavier, Elsik, Christine G., Jiang, Chun-Xiao, Katsar, Catherine Susan, Lan, Tien-Hung, Lin, Yann-Rong, Ming, Reiguang, Wright, Robert J.·2000·The Plant Cell

Abstract

Comparative genomics, the study of the similarities and differences in structure and function of hereditary information across taxa, uses molecular tools to investigate many notions that long preceded identification of DNA as the hereditary molecule. Vavilov’s (1922) law of homologous series in variation was an early suggestion of the similarities in the genetic blueprints of many (plant) species. Genetic analysis based on morphological and isoenzyme markers hinted at parallel arrangements of genes along the chromosomes of various taxa. These hints were later borne out at the DNA level, in seminal investigations of nightshades (Tanksley et al., 1988; Bonierbale et al., 1988) and grasses (Hulbert et al., 1990). Over the past two decades, multiple investigations of many additional taxa have delivered two broad messages: (1) In most plants, the evolution of the small but essential portion of the genome that actually encodes the organism’s genes has proceeded relatively slowly; as a result, taxa that have been reproductively isolated for millions of years have retained recognizable intragenic DNA sequences as well as similar arrangements of genes along the chromosomes. (2) A wide range of factors, such as ancient chromosomal or segmental duplications, mobility of DNA sequences, gene deletion, and localized rearrangements, has been superimposed on the relatively slow tempo of chromosomal evolution and causes many deviations from colinearity. The Brassicaceae comprise 360 genera, organized into 13 tribes (Shultz, 1936; Al-Shehbaz, 1973). The most economically important species are in the genus Brassica (tribe Brassiceae), six species of which are cultivated worldwide. Three of these species are considered diploid (B. rapa, A genome, 2n = 2x = 20; B. nigra, B genome, 2n = 2x = 16; B. oleracea, C genome, 2n = 2x = 18), and three are amphiploid derivatives of the diploids (B. juncea, AB, 2n = 4x = 36; B. napus, AC, 2n = 4x = 38; B. carinata, BC, 2n = 4x = 34). At least 15 molecular genetic maps have been constructed for Brassica that include all of the major cultivated species (Slocum et al., 1990; Landry et al., 1991, 1992; Song et al., 1991; Chyi et al., 1992; Kianian and Quiros, 1992; Figdore et al., 1993; Ferreira et al., 1994; Teutonico and Osborn, 1994; Uzunova et al., 1995; Lagercrantz and Lydiate, 1996; Truco et al., 1996; Lan et al., 2000a, 2000b; T.-H. Lan and A.H. Paterson, manuscript submitted). These maps include at least 935 different publicly available probes, with many shared by multiple maps. Within a species, the maps show almost complete colinearity (see Lydiate et al., 1993), except for small inversions that differ among some B. oleracea morphotypes (Kianian and Quiros, 1992; Lan et al., 2000a). Comparison of B. rapa with B. oleracea and B. napus supports the close evolutionary relationship between the two diploids but indicates that deletions and insertions may have occurred after divergence of the two species (Hoenecke and Chyi, 1991). The genome of the synthetic B. napus is essentially unrearranged with respect to its B. oleracea and B. rapa progenitors (Lydiate et al., 1993), although the evolution of wild B. napus (Cheung and Landry, 1996) has been accompanied by more complicated rearrangements. Extensive segmental duplications are found in both diploid and amphidiploid maps, supporting the hypothesis that diploid Brassica spp are derived from an ancestor with a lower original basic chromosome number; however, no duplications of whole linkage groups have been found. At least 22 chromosomal rearrangements differentiate B. oleracea homeologs from one another (Lan et al., 2000a) (see Figure 1). Most of the world’s food and feed crops are members of the family Poaceae, including rice, wheat, maize, sorghum, sugarcane, barley, oat, rye, millet, and others. Conservation across large chromosomal tracts, spanning ∼65 million years of evolution (Figure 2), is a recurring message from many investigations of diverse Poaceae (see Bennetzen and Freeling, 1993). Pioneering efforts in the comparative mapping of maize and sorghum (Hulbert et al., 1990) have been supported by more detailed studies (Whitkus et al., 1992; Berhan et al., 1993; Binelli et al., 1993; Chittenden et al., 1994; Pereira et al., 1994) and supplemented by the comparative organization of maize and rice (Ahn and Tanksley, 1993), wheat and rice (Kurata et al., 1994), and maize, wheat, and rice (Ahn et al., 1993). A host of investigations additionally encompasses many other cultivated Poaceae, with particular emphasis on the interrelationships among the homeologous chromosome sets of the Triticeae and their relatives (see Naranjo et al., 1987; Chao et al., 1989; Liu and Tsunewaki, 1991; Devos et al., 1992a, 1992b, 1993, 1995; Liu et al., 1992; Xie et al., 1993; Namuth et al., 1994; Hohmann et al., 1995; Marino et al., 1996; Mickelson-Young et al., 1995; Nelson et al., 1995a, 1995b, 1995c; Van Deynze et al., 1995). Curiously, even in the re

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1523

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Paterson, A. H., Bowers, J. E., Burow, M. D., Draye, X., Elsik, C. G., Jiang, C.-X., Katsar, C. S., Lan, T.-H., Lin, Y.-R., Ming, R., & Wright, R. J.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2000-09
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
1523-1539
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2098188415
Cited by
317
References
95
FWCI
37.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.12.9.1523
The paper
Paterson, A. H., Bowers, J. E., Burow, M. D., Draye, X., Elsik, C. G., Jiang, C.-X., Katsar, C. S., Lan, T.-H., Lin, Y.-R., Ming, R., & Wright, R. J. (2000). Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.9.1523

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.