The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes
Open accessAbstract
Comparative genomics, the study of the similarities and differences in structure and function of hereditary information across taxa, uses molecular tools to investigate many notions that long preceded identification of DNA as the hereditary molecule. Vavilov’s (1922) law of homologous series in variation was an early suggestion of the similarities in the genetic blueprints of many (plant) species. Genetic analysis based on morphological and isoenzyme markers hinted at parallel arrangements of genes along the chromosomes of various taxa. These hints were later borne out at the DNA level, in seminal investigations of nightshades (Tanksley et al., 1988; Bonierbale et al., 1988) and grasses (Hulbert et al., 1990). Over the past two decades, multiple investigations of many additional taxa have delivered two broad messages: (1) In most plants, the evolution of the small but essential portion of the genome that actually encodes the organism’s genes has proceeded relatively slowly; as a result, taxa that have been reproductively isolated for millions of years have retained recognizable intragenic DNA sequences as well as similar arrangements of genes along the chromosomes. (2) A wide range of factors, such as ancient chromosomal or segmental duplications, mobility of DNA sequences, gene deletion, and localized rearrangements, has been superimposed on the relatively slow tempo of chromosomal evolution and causes many deviations from colinearity. The Brassicaceae comprise 360 genera, organized into 13 tribes (Shultz, 1936; Al-Shehbaz, 1973). The most economically important species are in the genus Brassica (tribe Brassiceae), six species of which are cultivated worldwide. Three of these species are considered diploid (B. rapa, A genome, 2n = 2x = 20; B. nigra, B genome, 2n = 2x = 16; B. oleracea, C genome, 2n = 2x = 18), and three are amphiploid derivatives of the diploids (B. juncea, AB, 2n = 4x = 36; B. napus, AC, 2n = 4x = 38; B. carinata, BC, 2n = 4x = 34). At least 15 molecular genetic maps have been constructed for Brassica that include all of the major cultivated species (Slocum et al., 1990; Landry et al., 1991, 1992; Song et al., 1991; Chyi et al., 1992; Kianian and Quiros, 1992; Figdore et al., 1993; Ferreira et al., 1994; Teutonico and Osborn, 1994; Uzunova et al., 1995; Lagercrantz and Lydiate, 1996; Truco et al., 1996; Lan et al., 2000a, 2000b; T.-H. Lan and A.H. Paterson, manuscript submitted). These maps include at least 935 different publicly available probes, with many shared by multiple maps. Within a species, the maps show almost complete colinearity (see Lydiate et al., 1993), except for small inversions that differ among some B. oleracea morphotypes (Kianian and Quiros, 1992; Lan et al., 2000a). Comparison of B. rapa with B. oleracea and B. napus supports the close evolutionary relationship between the two diploids but indicates that deletions and insertions may have occurred after divergence of the two species (Hoenecke and Chyi, 1991). The genome of the synthetic B. napus is essentially unrearranged with respect to its B. oleracea and B. rapa progenitors (Lydiate et al., 1993), although the evolution of wild B. napus (Cheung and Landry, 1996) has been accompanied by more complicated rearrangements. Extensive segmental duplications are found in both diploid and amphidiploid maps, supporting the hypothesis that diploid Brassica spp are derived from an ancestor with a lower original basic chromosome number; however, no duplications of whole linkage groups have been found. At least 22 chromosomal rearrangements differentiate B. oleracea homeologs from one another (Lan et al., 2000a) (see Figure 1). Most of the world’s food and feed crops are members of the family Poaceae, including rice, wheat, maize, sorghum, sugarcane, barley, oat, rye, millet, and others. Conservation across large chromosomal tracts, spanning ∼65 million years of evolution (Figure 2), is a recurring message from many investigations of diverse Poaceae (see Bennetzen and Freeling, 1993). Pioneering efforts in the comparative mapping of maize and sorghum (Hulbert et al., 1990) have been supported by more detailed studies (Whitkus et al., 1992; Berhan et al., 1993; Binelli et al., 1993; Chittenden et al., 1994; Pereira et al., 1994) and supplemented by the comparative organization of maize and rice (Ahn and Tanksley, 1993), wheat and rice (Kurata et al., 1994), and maize, wheat, and rice (Ahn et al., 1993). A host of investigations additionally encompasses many other cultivated Poaceae, with particular emphasis on the interrelationships among the homeologous chromosome sets of the Triticeae and their relatives (see Naranjo et al., 1987; Chao et al., 1989; Liu and Tsunewaki, 1991; Devos et al., 1992a, 1992b, 1993, 1995; Liu et al., 1992; Xie et al., 1993; Namuth et al., 1994; Hohmann et al., 1995; Marino et al., 1996; Mickelson-Young et al., 1995; Nelson et al., 1995a, 1995b, 1995c; Van Deynze et al., 1995). Curiously, even in the re
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Exploring the Metabolic and Genetic Control of Gene Expression on a Genomic Scale
DeRisi, J. L., Iyer, V. R., & Brown, P. O. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.680 · Cited by 4,456
A Genomic Perspective on Protein Families
Tatusov, R. L., Koonin, E. V., & Lipman, D. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.631 · Cited by 3,590
High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes.
Tanksley, S. D., Ganal, M. W., Prince, J. P., de Vicente, M. C., Bonierbale, M. W., Broun, P., Fulton, T. M., Giovannoni, J. J., Grandillo, S., & Martin, G. B. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/132.4.1141 · Cited by 1,588
Karlin, S., & Altschul, S. F. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.6.2264 · Cited by 1,535
Nested Retrotransposons in the Intergenic Regions of the Maize Genome
SanMiguel, P., Tikhonov, A., Jin, Y.-K., Motchoulskaia, N., Zakharov, D., Melake-Berhan, A., Springer, P. S., Edwards, K. J., Lee, M., Avramova, Z., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5288.765 · Cited by 1,401
Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien
(1906) · Botanical Gazette · doi:10.1086/328835 · Cited by 1,347
Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms
Masterson, J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.264.5157.421 · Cited by 1,176
Simmonds, N. W. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,171
Song, K., Lu, P., Tang, K., & Osborn, T. C. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.17.7719 · Cited by 1,019
Cited by
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification
Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Leebens‐Mack, J., Bell, C. D., Paterson, A. H., Zheng, C., Sankoff, D., de Pamphilis, C. W., Wall, P. K., & Soltis, P. S. (2009) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.0800079 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationFunctional Divergence of Duplicated Genes Formed by Polyploidy during Arabidopsis Evolution[W]
Blanc, G., & Wolfe, K. H. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.021410 · Cited by 1,076
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
Evolutionary dynamics of grass genomes
Gaut, B. S. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00352.x · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Paterson, A. H., Bowers, J. E., Burow, M. D., Draye, X., Elsik, C. G., Jiang, C.-X., Katsar, C. S., Lan, T.-H., Lin, Y.-R., Ming, R., & Wright, R. J.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1523-1539
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2098188415
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 37.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.12.9.1523
- The paper
- Paterson, A. H., Bowers, J. E., Burow, M. D., Draye, X., Elsik, C. G., Jiang, C.-X., Katsar, C. S., Lan, T.-H., Lin, Y.-R., Ming, R., & Wright, R. J. (2000). Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.9.1523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.