The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subgenome Dominance in an Interspecific Hybrid, Synthetic Allopolyploid, and a 140-Year-Old Naturally Established Neo-Allopolyploid Monkeyflower
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies have shown that one of the parental subgenomes in ancient polyploids is generally more dominant, having retained more genes and being more highly expressed, a phenomenon termed subgenome dominance. The genomic features that determine how quickly and which subgenome dominates within a newly formed polyploid remain poorly understood. To investigate the rate of emergence of subgenome dominance, we examined gene expression, gene methylation, and transposable element (TE) methylation in a natural, <140-year-old allopolyploid (Mimulus peregrinus), a resynthesized interspecies triploid hybrid (M. robertsii), a resynthesized allopolyploid (M. peregrinus), and progenitor species (M. guttatus and M. luteus). We show that subgenome expression dominance occurs instantly following the hybridization of divergent genomes and significantly increases over generations. Additionally, CHH methylation levels are reduced in regions near genes and within TEs in the first-generation hybrid, intermediate in the resynthesized allopolyploid, and are repatterned differently between the dominant and recessive subgenomes in the natural allopolyploid. Subgenome differences in levels of TE methylation mirror the increase in expression bias observed over the generations following hybridization. These findings provide important insights into genomic and epigenomic shock that occurs following hybridization and polyploid events and may also contribute to uncovering the mechanistic basis of heterosis and subgenome dominance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Martin, M. (2011) · EMBnet.journal · doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · Cited by 33,889
RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome
Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 · Cited by 22,179
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V., & Zdobnov, E. M. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 · Cited by 13,344
Haas, B. J., Papanicolaou, A., Yassour, M., Grabherr, M., Blood, P. D., Bowden, J., Couger, M. B., Eccles, D., Li, B., Lieber, M., et al. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.084 · Cited by 8,464
Emms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2 · Cited by 3,408
PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments
Suyama, M., Torrents, D., & Bork, P. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl315 · Cited by 3,318
Cited by
The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat
Ramírez-González, R. H., Borrill, P., Lang, D., Harrington, S. A., Brinton, J., Venturini, L., Davey, M., Jacobs, J., van Ex, F., Pasha, A., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar6089 · Cited by 1,018
Ren, R., Wang, H., Guo, C., Zhang, N., Zeng, L., Chen, Y., Ma, H., & Qi, J. (2018) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.01.002 · Cited by 401
Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants
Cheng, F., Wu, J., Cai, X., Liang, J., Freeling, M., & Wang, X. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0136-7 · Cited by 398
Wendel, J. F., Lisch, D., Hu, G., & Mason, A. S. (2018) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2018.01.004 · Cited by 247
Zhao, M., Zhang, B., Lisch, D., & Ma, J. (2017) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.17.00595 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Edger, P. P., Smith, R., McKain, M. R., Cooley, A. M., Vallejo-Marin, M., Yuan, Y., Bewick, A. J., Ji, L., Platts, A. E., Bowman, M. J., Childs, K. L., Washburn, J. D., Schmitz, R. J., Smith, G. D., Pires, J. C., & Puzey, J. R.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-08-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2150-2167
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2950988036
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 20.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subgenome Dominance in an Interspecific Hybrid, Synthetic Allopolyploid, and a 140-Year-Old Naturally Established Neo-Allopolyploid Monkeyflower. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.17.00010
- The paper
- Edger, P. P., Smith, R., McKain, M. R., Cooley, A. M., Vallejo-Marin, M., Yuan, Y., Bewick, A. J., Ji, L., Platts, A. E., Bowman, M. J., Childs, K. L., Washburn, J. D., Schmitz, R. J., Smith, G. D., Pires, J. C., & Puzey, J. R. (2017). Subgenome Dominance in an Interspecific Hybrid, Synthetic Allopolyploid, and a 140-Year-Old Naturally Established Neo-Allopolyploid Monkeyflower. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.