Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,785

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TREOR, a semi-exhaustive trial-and-error powder indexing program for all symmetries

Werner, P. E., Eriksson, L., Westdahl, M.·1985·Journal of Applied Crystallography

Abstract

An indexing program, TREOR, mainly based on trial-and-error methods is described. The program contains separate routines for cubic, tetragonal, hexagonal, orthorhombic, monoclinic and triclinic symmetries. Ten years usage has been analysed to improve the original program. For monoclinic indexing a specific short-axis test has been developed. The over-all success rate of the program has been found to be better than 90%, and considerably more for orthorhombic and higher symmetries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0021889885010512

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,785

Metadata

Authors
Werner, P. E., Eriksson, L., & Westdahl, M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Crystallography
Published
1985-10-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
367-370
ISSN
0021-8898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042877835
Cited by
1,785
References
0
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TREOR, a semi-exhaustive trial-and-error powder indexing program for all symmetries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0021889885010512
The paper
Werner, P. E., Eriksson, L., & Westdahl, M. (1985). TREOR, a semi-exhaustive trial-and-error powder indexing program for all symmetries. Journal of Applied Crystallography. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889885010512

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.