Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Complex crystal structure determination and anti-non-small-cell lung cancer activity of the Hsp90N inhibitor Debio0932

Qin, Wei, Yu, Feng, Zhou, Huan, Li, Ping, Zhou, Fang, Li, Hui-Jin, He, Chun-Xia, Xing, Lu, Zhou, Xin, Zhao, Dong, Li, Peng-Quan, Jin, Xi, Wang, Qi-Sheng, He, Jian-Hua, Cao, Hui-Ling·2021·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology

Abstract

Debio0932 is a promising lead compound in phase I clinical trials targeting the N-terminal ATP-binding pocket of the molecular chaperone heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90 N). The absence of a crystal structure of the Hsp90 N–Debio0932 complex, however, has impeded further structural optimization of Debio0932 and understanding of the molecular-interaction mechanism. Here, a high-resolution crystal structure of the Hsp90 N–Debio0932 complex was successfully determined (resolution limit 2.20 Å; PDB entry 6lr9) by X-ray diffraction and the molecular-interaction mechanism was analysed in detail, which suggested that Debio0932 suppresses cancer cells by accommodating itself in the ATP-binding pocket of Hsp90 N, disabling its molecular-chaperone capability. The results of a thermal shift assay (Δ T m = 8.83 ± 0.90°C) and isothermal titration calorimetry (K d = 15.50 ± 1.30 n M) indicated strong binding and favourable thermodynamic changes in the binding of Hsp90 N and Debio0932. Based on the crystal structure of the complex and on molecular-interaction analysis, 30 new Debio0932 derivatives were designed and nine new derivatives exhibited increased binding to Hsp90 N, as determined by molecular-docking evaluation. Additionally, Debio0932 suppressed cell proliferation (IC 50 values of 3.26 ± 2.82 µ M for A549, 20.33 ± 5.39 µ M for H1299 and 3.16 ± 1.04 µ M for H1975), induced cell-cycle arrest and promoted apoptosis in three non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. These results provide novel perspectives and guidance for the development of new anti-NSCLC drugs based on the lead compound Debio0932.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s2059798320014990

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Andreotti, 2015, Drug Test. Anal., 7, 831, 10.1002/dta.1798 · DOI
  2. Bao, 2009, Clin. Cancer Res., 15, 4046, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0152 · DOI
  3. Bao, 2009, Mol. Cancer Ther., 8, 3296, 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0538 · DOI
  4. Bray, 2018, CA Cancer J. Clin., 68, 394, 10.3322/caac.21492 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cao, 2017, Nucl. Sci. Tech., 28, 148, 10.1007/s41365-017-0300-1 · DOI
  6. Donnelly, 2008, Curr. Med. Chem., 15, 2702, 10.2174/092986708786242895 · DOI
  7. Emsley, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ettinger, 2017, J. Natl Compr. Canc. Netw., 15, 504, 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0050 · DOI
  9. He, 2014, Acta Cryst. D, 70, 186, 10.1107/S1399004713029155 · DOI
  10. Immormino, 2006, J. Med. Chem., 49, 4953, 10.1021/jm060297x · DOI
  11. Isambert, 2015, Ann. Oncol., 26, 1005, 10.1093/annonc/mdv031 · DOI
  12. Li, 2015, Nucl. Sci. Tech., 26, 60503
  13. Li, 2012, Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin., 44, 300, 10.1093/abbs/gms001 · DOI
  14. Liebschner, 2019, Acta Cryst. D, 75, 861, 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lo, 2004, Anal. Biochem., 332, 153, 10.1016/j.ab.2004.04.031 · DOI
  16. Lundgren, K. & Biamonte, M. A. (2014). Inhibitors of Molecular Chaperones as Therapeutic Agents, edited by T. D. Machajewski & G. Gao, pp. 158-179. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
  17. Martinez Molina, 2013, Science, 341, 84, 10.1126/science.1233606 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Mayer, 2009, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 16, 2, 10.1038/nsmb0109-2 · DOI
  19. McNicholas, 2011, Acta Cryst. D, 67, 386, 10.1107/S0907444911007281 · DOI
  20. Minor, 2006, Acta Cryst. D, 62, 859, 10.1107/S0907444906019949 · DOI
  21. Olszewska, 2020, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 871, 172943, 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.172943 · DOI
  22. Rotow, 2017, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 17, 637, 10.1038/nrc.2017.84 · DOI
  23. Taipale, 2010, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 11, 515, 10.1038/nrm2918 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Wang, 2018, Nucl. Sci. Tech., 29, 68, 10.1007/s41365-018-0398-9 · DOI
  25. Whitesell, 2005, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 5, 761, 10.1038/nrc1716 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Winn, 2011, Acta Cryst. D, 67, 235, 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ye, 2017, Ren. Fail., 39, 458, 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1308257 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Qin, W., Yu, F., Zhou, H., Li, P., Zhou, F., Li, H.-J., He, C.-X., Xing, L., Zhou, X., Zhao, D., Li, P.-Q., Jin, X., Wang, Q.-S., He, J.-H., & Cao, H.-L.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
86-97
ISSN
2059-7983
Cited by
3
References
0
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China, Joint Fund of Research utilizing Large-scale Scientific Facilities (U1932130)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China, Young Scientists Fund (31700699)
  • Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Department (2017ZDXM-SF-029)
  • Education Department of Shaanxi Province, Scientific Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Education Department (17JS118)
  • Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2019-ZZ-ZY009)
  • Weiyang District Bureau of Science, Technology and Industry Information Technology (201928)
  • Xi'an Medical University (2015RCYJ01, 2018PT28, 2018PT24, 2018PT25)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.