Individual differences in servant leadership: the roles of values and personality
Abstract
Purpose: The paper seeks to address the lack of empirical research on servant leadership by investigating relationships between servant leadership and four individual differences – values of empathy, integrity, and competence and the five‐factor model's personality factor of agreeableness. Design/methodology/approach: Dennis and Winston's servant leadership scale (a revision of Page and Wong's servant leadership instrument), Braithwaite and Law's Goal and Mode Values Inventories, Mayer and Davis' integrity scale, and Costa and McCrae's NEO Five‐Factor Inventory were used with 288 followers and 126 leaders in three organizations in order to measure relationships between followers' ratings of leaders' servant leadership, followers' ratings of leaders' values of empathy, integrity, and competence and leaders' ratings of their own agreeableness. Findings: Followers' ratings of leaders' servant leadership were positively related to followers' ratings of leaders' values of empathy, integrity, and competence. Followers' ratings of leaders' servant leadership were also positively related to leaders' ratings of their own agreeableness. Research limitations/implications: Common method bias is a potential limitation due to respondents' tendency toward consistency in responses. Practical implications: Organizations embracing servant leadership may benefit from selecting leaders partly on the basis of certain personal attributes such as those investigated in the present study. Furthermore, in order to maintain a servant leadership culture and to retain leaders in a servant leadership organization, recruiters and trainers in servant leadership organizations would likely benefit from communicating accurate information about attributes valued in a servant leadership culture – e.g. attributes explored in the present research. Originality/value: The study extends our understanding of servant leadership research by offering support for individual attributes related to the practice of servant leadership.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Servant leadership is negatively predicted by extraversion, unlike other more charismatic or leader-centric forms of leadership.
“Altogether, this more communal focus may explain why, unlike other more charismatic or leader-centric forms of leadership (Judge, Bono, Ilies, & Gerhardt, 2002), servant leadership is negatively predicted by extraversion (Washington et al., 2006).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Washington et al., 2006
Empathy is a unique and key individual characteristic that facilitates servant leaders' concern for a broad set of stakeholders.
“One unique and key individual characteristic that facilitates servant leaders' concern for a broad set of stakeholders is empathy (Washington, Sutton, & Feild, 2006).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Washington, Sutton, & Feild, 2006
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
A factor analysis of Page and Wong’s servant leadership instrument
Dennis, R., & Winston, B. E. (2003) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730310505885 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis
van Dierendonck, D. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310380462 · Cited by 2,218 · see citing works
A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts
Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0121 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Hunter, E. M., Neubert, M. J., Perry, S. J., Witt, L. A., Penney, L. M., & Weinberger, E. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.12.001 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Neubert, M. J., Hunter, E. M., & Tolentino, R. C. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Holt, S., & Marques, J. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0951-5 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Flynn, C. B., Smither, J. W., & Walker, A. G. (2016) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051815621257 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
How Can Servant Leadership Promote Employees’ Voice Behavior? A Moderated Chain Mediation Model
Chen, H., Wang, L., & Li, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938983 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Washington, R. R., Sutton, C. D., & Feild, H. S.
- Affiliations
- Auburn University (US)
- Venue
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 700-716
- ISSN
- 0143-7739 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056652860
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
- Keywords
- servant leadership, individual differences, values, personality, agreeableness, empathy, integrity, competence, follower perceptions, leadership selection, leader traits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review