CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 137Leadership and Management in OrganizationsWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

A factor analysis of Page and Wong’s servant leadership instrument

Dennis, Rob, Winston, Bruce E.·2003·Leadership & Organization Development Journal
DOI 10.1108/01437730310505885
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This study conducted a factor analysis of Page and Wong's servant leadership instrument and reduced the 99‐item scale to 20 items yielding three factors: vision (0.97 Cronbach alpha), empowerment (0.89 Cronbach alpha), and service (0.94 Cronbach alpha). While this study only confirmed three of the original 12 factors sought by Page and Wong the results indicate that Page and Wong's instrument has merit and deserves further development and modification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01437730310505885

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When used in samples other than the development sample, constructs that were hypothesized to be separate constructs collapsed into one.

    “When used in other samples than the development one, constructs that were hypothesized to be separate constructs collapsed into one (e.g., Dannhauser and Boshoff 2007; Dennis and Winston 2003).”

    From The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2011) · cites this paper as Dennis and Winston 2003

  • Dennis and Winston reduced the factor structure of the Servant Leadership Profile to a three-dimensional structure.

    “In an attempt to replicate this factor structure, Dennis and Winston (2003) even brought it back to a three-dimensional structure.”

    From The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2011) · cites this paper as Dennis and Winston (2003)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Dennis, R., & Winston, B. E.
Affiliations
Regent University (US)
ORCID
Winston, Bruce E.
Venue
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2003-12
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
455-459
ISSN
0143-7739 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/01437730310505885
OpenAlex
W2093818392
Cited by
134
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emeraldinsight.com/page/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Leadership & Organization Development Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
servant leadership, scale factor structure, scale reduction, vision, empowerment, service, leadership assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review