The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning on lean: a review of thinking and research
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of research on lean production (LP) since the concept was developed at the end of the 1980s with the aim of developing a model that permits an extended and comprehensive understanding of LP. Design/methodology/approach: A literature survey of peer reviewed journal articles and paradigmatic books with managerial impact is employed as the research methodology. Findings: The findings derived from the evaluation of the publications analysed have led to the creation of an extended model of LP. Specifically, two new groups of factors to be taken into account in order to achieve a comprehensive understanding of LP are presented. Apart from internal aspects at the shop floor level and value chain elements, the model provided includes work organisation and the impact that the geographical context has on LP. In addition, the critical assessment of publications has allowed a number of specific aspects to be identified for which there is no empirical evidence. Originality/value: This paper puts forward a new classification of literature identifying key aspects that should be included for LP development and management. It might represent new opportunities for rigorous and relevant research that would contribute to more transparent knowledge of LP being gained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0 · Cited by 2,897
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001 · Cited by 549
Parker, S. K. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.620 · Cited by 438
The effects of Lean production on worker job stress
Conti, R., Angelis, J., Cooper, C., Faragher, B., & Gill, C. (2006) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570610682616 · Cited by 336
Lean implementation within SMEs: a literature review
Hu, Q., Mason, R., Williams, S. J., & Found, P. (2015) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-02-2014-0013 · Cited by 275
Lean production assessed by Karasek's job demand-job control model
Schouteten, R., & Benders, J. (2004) · Economic and Industrial Democracy · doi:10.1177/0143831x04044831 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2012-0315 · Cited by 983
Lean implementation within SMEs: a literature review
Hu, Q., Mason, R., Williams, S. J., & Found, P. (2015) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-02-2014-0013 · Cited by 275
Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance
Tortorella, G. L., Miorando, R., & Marodin, G. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.006 · Cited by 166
Samuel, D., Found, P., & Williams, S. J. (2015) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2013-0555 · Cited by 146
Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Bonavia, T. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.975852 · Cited by 133
Antony, J., Psomas, E., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Hines, P. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1776410 · Cited by 116
Goshime, Y., Kitaw, D., & Jilcha, K. (2019) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-06-2017-0063 · Cited by 112
Research gaps in Lean manufacturing: a systematic literature review
Psomas, E., & Antony, J. (2019) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/ijqrm-12-2017-0260 · Cited by 93
Lean implementation failures: The role of organizational ambidexterity
Secchi, R., & Camuffo, A. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.007 · Cited by 74
Cadden, T., Millar, K., Treacy, R., & Humphreys, P. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107744 · Cited by 65
Measuring and building lean thinking for value creation in supply chains
Shamah, R. A. M. (2013) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/20401461311310490 · Cited by 40
Cost performance dynamics in lean production leveling
Deif, A. M., & ElMaraghy, H. (2014) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.05.010 · Cited by 40
Pozo, H., Roque da Silva, O., & Tachizawa, T. (2017) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2017.1405718 · Cited by 14
Martínez, P., Martínez, J., Nuño, P., & Cavazos, J. (2015) · Información tecnológica · doi:10.4067/s0718-07642015000600019 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyano‐Fuentes, J., & Sacristán‐Díaz, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-04-20
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 551-582
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022045384
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 40.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.