The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
World‐class manufacturing project: overview and selected results
Abstract
A number of authors have used terms such as “world‐class manufacturing”, “high performance manufacturing” and others to describe comprehensive approaches to manufacturing performance improvement. They have broken new ground by introducing the notion of broad, organization‐wide improvement approaches, involving many complex interrelationships. However, testing the associated relationships is just beginning. The WCM Project seeks to articulate the practices which are associated with world‐class manufacturing and their interrelationships. In this attempt, a number of studies have been conducted, using the comprehensive database developed for the project. Provides a detailed examination of the development and verification of the database, which contains perceptual and objective information about quality, JIT, technology, strategy, organization characteristics and human resource management practices of 42 plants in the machinery, electronics and transportation components industries. It also provides a brief overview of three of the studies conducted as part of this project, dealing with: manufacturing process innovation; the relationship between quality practices and performance; and the relationship between TQM and JIT. Each of these highlights specific practices which are related to performance, as well as relevant infrastructure characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Cited by
Survey research in operations management: a process‐based perspective
Forza, C. (2002) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570210414310 · Cited by 1,610
A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity
González‐Benito, J., & González‐Benito, Ó. (2006) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.450 · Cited by 850
Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective
Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G., & Shah, R. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.001 · Cited by 612
Self-citationManufacturing strategy: Literature review and some issues
Dangayach, G. S., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570110393414 · Cited by 469
Sila, I., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2002) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/02656710210434801 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G., Flynn, E. J., Sakakibara, S., & Bates, K. A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 671-685
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029544603
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: World‐class manufacturing project: overview and selected results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443579710175592
- The paper
- Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G., Flynn, E. J., Sakakibara, S., & Bates, K. A. (1997). World‐class manufacturing project: overview and selected results. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579710175592
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.