The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating leadership development and succession planning best practices
Abstract
Purpose: Organizations often fail to utilize managerial personnel effectively for leadership development and succession planning systems, and many execute these critical practices through separate human resource functions that shift the responsibility for leadership development away from line managers. The purpose of this article is to present a best practices model for optimal development of the leadership pipeline and a series of practical recommendations for organizations. Design/methodology/approach: A group of 30 CEOs and human resource executives across 15 best practice organizations were asked via semi‐structured interviews to describe the content and delivery of their respective organizations' leadership development and succession planning practices. Findings: Analysis of interview data indicated that best practice organizations effectively integrate leadership development and succession planning systems by fully utilizing managerial personnel in developing the organization's mentor network, identifying and codifying high potential employees, developing high potentials via project‐based learning experiences and manager‐facilitated workshops, establishing a flexible and fluid succession planning process, creating organization‐wide forums for exposing high potential employees to multiple stakeholders, and establishing a supportive organizational culture. Research limitations/implications: The interview data are drawn from a relatively small number of executives and from a single industry, which may limit the overall utility of the findings. Originality/value: This study offers needed empirical support for the value of integrating leadership development and succession planning practices through utilization of managerial personnel. Management development practitioners will benefit from assessing their respective organizations' current practices vis‐à‐vis those discussed here, while scholars may utilize the best practices model for generating further research on the role of managerial personnel in talent management systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Day, D. V. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00061-8 · Cited by 2,180
Cited by
Patching Up the “Leaking Leadership Pipeline”: Fostering Mid-career Faculty Succession Management
Baker, V. L., Lunsford, L. G., & Pifer, M. J. (2019) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-018-9528-9 · Cited by 41
(Un)Planned Failure: Unsuccessful Succession Planning in an Urban District
Peters, A. L. (2011) · Journal of School Leadership · doi:10.1177/105268461102100104 · Cited by 26
Succession Planning in Malaysian Institution of Higher Education
Abdullah, Z., Samah, S. A. A., Jusoff, K., & Isa, P. M. (2009) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v2n1p129 · Cited by 17
Examining Succession and Replacement Planning in Work organizations
Gabriel, P. I., Biriowu, C. S., & Dagogo, E. L.-J. (2020) · European Journal of Business and Management Research · doi:10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.2.192 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Groves, K. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Development
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-03-27
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-260
- ISSN
- 0262-1711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053606898
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.