The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An investigation of consumer acceptance of M‐banking
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to identify and test the key motivators and inhibitors for consumer acceptance of mobile phone banking (M‐banking), particularly those that affect the consumer's attitude towards, and intention to use, this self‐service banking technology. Design/methodology/approach: A web‐based survey was undertaken where respondents completed a questionnaire about their perceptions of M‐banking's ease of use, usefulness, cost, risk, compatibility with their lifestyle, and their need for interaction with personnel. Correlation and hierarchical multiple regression analysis, with Sobel tests, were used to determine whether these factors influenced consumers' attitude and intention to use M‐banking. Findings: Perceived usefulness, perceived risk, cost and compatibility were found to affect consumer acceptance of M‐banking. The results also support a mediation model, whereby attitude transfers the affects of the consumers' perceptions to their intention to use M‐banking. Research limitations/implications: The sample used in this study contained a skew toward younger male consumers, affecting the generalisability of the results. Practical implications: Developing marketing programs that focus on creating a positive attitude toward M‐banking should attract consumers to this emerging electronic banking channel. Specifically, marketers should emphasise M‐banking's usefulness and compatibility with consumers' lifestyle, in addition to designing M‐banking systems that minimise risk and cost to the consumer. Originality/value: This paper validates and further develops an existing attitudinal model in the M‐banking context, answering the call for additional research to generalise and improve the explanatory power of self‐service technology acceptance models to other groups and countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701341316 · Cited by 9,973
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
MacKinnon, D. P. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203809556 · Cited by 5,618
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · Cited by 2,284
Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009 · Cited by 2,084
Cited by
Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM
Oliveira, T., Faria, M., Thomas, M. A., & Popovič, A. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004 · Cited by 808
Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2014) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-12-2012-0244 · Cited by 606
Merhi, M., Hone, K., & Tarhini, A. (2019) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101151 · Cited by 555
Towards an understanding of consumers’ FinTech adoption: The case of Open Banking
Chan, R., Troshani, I., Rao Hill, S., & Hoffmann, A. (2022) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-08-2021-0397 · Cited by 281
Banking “on-the-go”: examining consumers’ adoption of mobile banking services
Zhang, T., Lu, C., & Kizildag, M. (2018) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/ijqss-07-2017-0067 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Wessels, L., & Drennan, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Bank Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-10-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 547-568
- ISSN
- 0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029468735
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 26.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An investigation of consumer acceptance of M‐banking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02652321011085194
- The paper
- Wessels, L., & Drennan, J. (2010). An investigation of consumer acceptance of M‐banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321011085194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.