The DOI matches its Crossref record; 185 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to clarify emerging aspects and trends of Six Sigma literature over 17 years, from 1992 to 2008. Design/methodology/approach: The literature on Six Sigma from 417 referred journal articles in business and management disciplines, information systems and computer science, engineering, healthcare, etc. were systematically analyzed based on a scheme that consists of four distinct dimensions: publication year and journal, major themes, research type, and application sector (i.e. manufacturing vs service). Findings: A number of key findings emerged: Six Sigma research is growing rapidly, covering various disciplines and domains with a great focus on Six Sigma tools and techniques; empirical research is dominant with more emphasis on case study approach; and the growing gap between manufacturing‐ and service‐focused articles implies the return of Six Sigma to manufacturing as its initial base. Although a large volume of literature is available on Six Sigma, the topic is still under development and offers potential opportunities for further research and applications. Originality/value: The paper provides both academics and practitioners with a useful framework for pursuing rigorous Six Sigma research through explaining the chronological growth of Six Sigma, challenging themes of Six Sigma research, dominating research types and application areas in Six Sigma, and the major sources of Six Sigma information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298504900403 · Cited by 21,645
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications
Grönroos, C. (1984) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000004784 · Cited by 6,549
Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings.
Jolliffe, I. T., Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1988) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2983017 · Cited by 5,077
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800109 · Cited by 3,322
Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.131.18832 · Cited by 2,256
Ishikawa, K. (1985) · Cited by 2,200
Service loyalty: The effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer satisfaction
Caruana, A. (2002) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560210430818 · Cited by 1,528
The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms
Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482 · Cited by 1,282
Budescu, D. V. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542 · Cited by 1,193
Metadata
- Authors
- Gamal Aboelmaged, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-03-16
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 268-317
- ISSN
- 0265-671X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034915424
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 185
- FWCI
- 35.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02656711011023294
- The paper
- Gamal Aboelmaged, M. (2010). Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711011023294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.