Cited by 1,282Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionCultural Differences and ValuesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms

Suh, Eunkook, Diener, Ed, Oishi, Shigehiro, Triandis, Harry C.·1998·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The relative importance of emotions versus normative beliefs for life satisfaction judgments was compared among individualist and collectivist nations in 2 large sets of international data (in total, 61 nations, N = 62,446). Among nations, emotions and life satisfaction correlated significantly more strongly in more individualistic nations (r =.52 in Study 1; r =.48 in Study 2). At the individual level, emotions were far superior predictors of life satisfaction to norms (social approval of life satisfaction) in individualist cultures, whereas norms and emotions were equally strong predictors of life satisfaction in collectivist cultures. The present findings have implications for future studies on cultural notions of well-being, the functional value of emotional experiences, and individual differences in life satisfaction profiles. Across the world, is the "good life " attained mostly by doing what a person would like to do or by doing what a person thinks he or she should do? More broadly, are internal processes, such as attitudes, beliefs, emotions, and the like, or external pro-

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People in collectivist cultures more often rely on social norms to decide whether they should be satisfied and consider the social appraisals of family and friends in evaluating their lives.

    “people in collectivist cultures more often rely on social norms to decide whether they should be satisfied and consider the social appraisals of family and friends in evaluating their lives”

    From Why do people use Facebook? (2012) · cites this paper as Suh et al., 1998

  • There are cultural differences in the association between congruence and life satisfaction; in South Korea, congruence was much less important than in the US.

    “there are cultural differences in the association between congruence (i.e., acting consistently across situations and in accord with one's self) and life satisfaction. For example, in South Korea, congruence was much less important than in the US.”

    From Why do people use Facebook? (2012) · cites this paper as Suh et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1998-02
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
482-493
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2133776541
Cited by
1,282
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 68
FWCI
34.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
life satisfaction, emotions, normative beliefs, individualism, collectivism, cross-cultural comparison, well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review