Cited by 142Employer Branding and e-HRMAI and HR TechnologiesHuman Resource and Talent Management

Organizational adoption of e‐HRM in Europe: An empirical exploration of major adoption factors

Strohmeier, Stefan, Kabst, Rüdiger·2009·Journal of Managerial Psychology

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine which factors influence the cross‐national organizational adoption of electronic human resource management (e‐HRM) in Europe. Design/methodology/approach: Major general and contextual influence factors are derived and tested based on a large‐scale survey with a sample of 2,336 organizations in 23 European countries using logistic regression. Findings: The findings first reveal that e‐HRM is a common practice throughout Europe since two‐thirds of all organizations have already adopted e‐HRM. Major general determinants of e‐HRM adoption are size, work organization, and configuration of HRM. In addition, there are major cross‐national differences in e‐HRM adoption, unexpectedly revealing Eastern post‐communist countries to lead e‐HRM adoption. Research limitations/implications: Abundance of general and scarcity of contextual factors imply that there should be further important factors of adoption not considered in this paper. Owing to its cross‐sectional character, the paper is not able to reveal findings of convergence or divergence of adoption over time. Practical implications: HR professionals should be informed about the advanced state of e‐HRM adoption, while some general insights are offered which kind of organizations should take an adoption of e‐HRM into consideration. Originality/value: This paper is a large‐scale sample‐based evaluation of cross‐national influence factors that drive organizational adoption of e‐HRM in Europe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02683940910974099

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior literature focusing on technology-driven HRM has considered TOP factors for understanding adoption, which reinforces the importance of TOP framework in identifying the antecedents of HRM (AI) assimilation in an organisation.

    “Prior literature focusing on technology-driven HRM (i.e., e-HRM, HRIS) has considered TOP factors for understanding adoption (see, e.g., Bondarouk et al., 2017a; Burbach & Royle, 2014; Strohmeier & Kabst, 2009; Troshani et al., 2014), which reinforces the importance of TOP framework in identifying the antecedents of HRM (AI) assimilation in an organisation.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Strohmeier & Kabst, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strohmeier, S., & Kabst, R.
Affiliations
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Venue
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-08-14
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
482-501
ISSN
0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1516325905
Cited by
142
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Managerial Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
e-HRM, electronic human resource management, organizational adoption, cross-national differences, technology adoption factors, organizational size, work organization, post-communist states, Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review