The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A meta‐analysis
Abstract
Purpose: One of the strongest convictions in marketing is that market orientation contributes to firms' performance substantially more than alternative strategic orientations such as innovation and entrepreneurial orientations. Still, some studies show that alternative orientations can also substantially affect the performance of firms, and furthermore, that firms that combine market orientation with alternative orientations are likely to perform even better than firms adopting only market orientation. Also, the nature of the relationship between market orientation and other strategic orientations is not clear. The purpose of this paper is to deal with these discrepancies in the marketing literature. It highlights the importance of the study of the relationship between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations, examines the effect of market orientation on different orientations, and identifies the orientations that are more likely to be combined with market orientation. Design/methodology/approach: The study employs a meta‐analysis procedure to synthesize empirical results on the relationship between market orientation and innovation, learning, entrepreneurial, and employee orientations. Findings: Findings suggest that market orientation is strongly correlated with learning, entrepreneurial, and employee orientations, and that it has a moderate positive relationship with innovation orientation. Research limitations/implications: Research on market orientation should shift its focus, moving from the study of the direct effect of market orientation on business performance to the study of the various combinations of strategic orientations that firms can pursue in different situations, studying how the more successful market‐oriented firms balance between market orientation and other strategic orientations. Originality/value: This is the first meta‐analysis to examine the relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400403 · Cited by 7,947
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations
Day, G. S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800404 · Cited by 6,510
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Market Orientation and the Learning Organization
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299505900306 · Cited by 4,366
Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700304 · Cited by 4,343
Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400201 · Cited by 4,107
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200303 · Cited by 3,971
Cited by
Anderson, B. S., Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2009) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.72 · Cited by 375
Masa’deh, R., Al-Henzab, J., Tarhini, A., & Obeidat, B. Y. (2018) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-02-2017-0024 · Cited by 298
Strategic orientations and new product commercialization: mediator, moderator, and interplay
Mu, J., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2011) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00650.x · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Grinstein, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-02-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 115-134
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1560374637
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 114
- FWCI
- 39.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560810840934
- The paper
- Grinstein, A. (2008). The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A meta‐analysis. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560810840934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.