The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of different levels of environmental information on key consumer metrics. More specifically, it aims to evaluate environmentally benign products against those that have negative environmental impacts. Design/methodology/approach – Multiple product categories and messages that varied from strongly negative to strongly positive were used to test whether the accuracy/completeness of the information changes consumers’ view of green products. Findings – The results show that consumer perception of product quality, value, and purchase intentions does not differ significantly between products with positive environmental messages and those without any message. Products with positive environmental messages are viewed better than products with negative environmental messages. It is also found that the impact of environmental information is greater for consumable products. Practical implications – Clearly presented information can make a significant difference in consumer evaluation of products. If green products highlighted the reasons why products free of harmful ingredients did not have a negative impact on the environment, and if non-green products were required to disclose the harmful impact of their ingredients, green products would be favorably perceived over the non-green alternative. Social implications – The paper conjectures that if “fair” and clear explanations of environmental impact, both good and bad, are required, consumer evaluations of green products will improve and, ultimately, a larger percentage of consumers will purchase green products. The findings suggest that policy makers should require manufacturers to disclose key product ingredients and their environmental impact. Originality/value – This project adds to the growing body of literature on environmental labeling, and investigates the effects of different levels of environmental information on key consumer metrics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 2×
“Research on psychological choices by Tversky and Kahneman (1981) and Kahneman and Tversky (1979) has shown that people tend to be more sensitive to losses than to gains (loss aversion principle).”
BackgroundPutting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model
Witte, K. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 · Cited by 3,880
Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro‐Forleo, G. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000006155 · Cited by 2,974
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592
Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209174 · Cited by 1,172
Cited by
How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919825649 · Cited by 2,386
Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use
Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001 · Cited by 1,334
Lotfi, M., Yousefi, A., & Jafari, S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10072308 · Cited by 183
Role of Green Self-Identity and Peer Influence in Fostering Trust towards Organic Food Retailers
Khare, A., & Pandey, S. (2017) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/ijrdm-07-2016-0109 · Cited by 140
Green apparel buying behaviour: A study on Indian youth
Khare, A., & Sadachar, A. (2017) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12367 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Borin, N., Cerf, D. C., & Krishnan, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-01-25
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-86
- ISSN
- 0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060743643
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 24.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/07363761111101976
- The paper
- Borin, N., Cerf, D. C., & Krishnan, R. (2011). Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761111101976
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.