Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: A cross-market examination
Abstract
Examines the determinants that influence consumers’ intention to buy environmentally friendly products. Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour (TPB) provides the conceptual framework of the research and the appropriateness of the theory and is tested in two distinct market conditions (UK and Greece). Although the findings offer considerable support for the robustness of the TPB in explaining intention in both samples, there is some indication that the theory is more appropriate in well established markets that are characterised by clearly formulated behavioural patterns (i.e. the model fitting elements of the UK sample are superior to the corresponding ones obtained from the Greek sample). The results are consistent with previous research on moral behaviour.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If firms use green-wash activities to deceive customers, customers will not purchase their product any longer and may increase negative perception regarding the firm and its product.
“'If firms use green-wash activities to deceive customers, in order that they will not purchase their product any longer, as a result of that they may increase their negative perception regarding the firm and its product' [42].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057 · see citing works
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116 · see citing works
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549 · see citing works
Practical issues in structural modeling
BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C.-P. (1987) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004 · Cited by 5,804 · see citing works
Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173354 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
A Content Analysis of Environmental Advertising Claims: A Matrix Method Approach
Carlson, L., Grove, S. J., & Kangun, N. (1993) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1993.10673409 · Cited by 602 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By the end of the 1980s, increasing numbers of consumers described themselves as environmentalists (Fisher, 1990; Cross, 1990; Donaton and Fitzerald, 1992) and a number of opinion polls indicating an expressed desire to protect the environment emerged (Carlson et al., 1993).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action
Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006 · Cited by 2,399 · see citing works
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211216250 · Cited by 1,370 · see citing works
Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0 · Cited by 1,281 · see citing works
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x · Cited by 989 · see citing works
Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.834803 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Ahmed, N., Li, C., Khan, A., Qalati, S. A., Naz, S., & Rana, F. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2020.1785404 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Yang, C.-S., Lu, C.-S., Haider, J. J., & Marlow, P. B. (2013) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.005 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Health and cosmetics: Investigating consumers’ values for buying organic personal care products
Ghazali, E., Soon, P. C., Mutum, D. S., & Nguyen, B. (2017) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.002 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
The willingness to consume organic food: A review
Eyinade, G. A., Mushunje, A., & Yusuf, S. F. G. (2021) · Food and Agricultural Immunology · doi:10.1080/09540105.2021.1874885 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
“Several studies (Arvola et al., 2008; Hustvedt & Dickson, 2009; Jang et al., 2012; Kalafatis et al., 1999; Sparks & Shepherd, 1992; Thøgersen & Ölander, 2006) have applied this theory or its components to study consumer purchasing behaviour in regard to organic foods.”
BackgroundOrganic food consumption in Europe: international segmentation based on value system differences
Ruiz de Maya, S., López-López, I., & Munuera, J. L. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.019 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Role of Green Self-Identity and Peer Influence in Fostering Trust towards Organic Food Retailers
Khare, A., & Pandey, S. (2017) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/ijrdm-07-2016-0109 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
An Exploratory Study of Consumer Attitudes toward Green Cosmetics in the UK Market
Lin, Y., Yang, S., Hanifah, H., & Iqbal, Q. (2018) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci8040071 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Urbański, M., & ul Haque, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12051786 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Atkinson, L. (2013) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12025 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Atkinson, L., & Kim, Y. (2015) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.932817 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Investigating the reasons for storage of WEEE by residents – a potential for removal from households
Nowakowski, P. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.008 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Online environmental citizenship: Blogs, green marketing and consumer sentiment in the 21st Century
Luck, E., & Ginanti, A. (2013) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g313512901 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kalafatis, S. P., Pollard, M., East, R., & Tsogas, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Kingston University London (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 441-460
- ISSN
- 0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036460777
- Cited by
- 1,071
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- green marketing, theory of planned behavior, purchase intention, sustainable products, consumer behavior, cross-market comparison, moral behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review