The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service‐dominant logic perspective
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to propose and elaborate on a service‐dominant‐logic‐based conceptualization of relationship that transcends traditional conceptualizations. Design/methodology/approach: The paper consists of a review of traditional conceptualizations of relationship, a review of service‐dominant logic foundational premises that are useful in reframing the concept, and supporting views from the institutional economics and business ecosystems literature. Findings: A transcending, service‐dominant‐logic‐based conceptualization of relationship as a general term representing the network‐with‐and‐within‐network nature of value creation, with transactions as “temporal isolates” of relationships is suggested. Originality/value: This higher‐order conceptualization of relationship provides a foundation for better understanding the role of relationship in value creation, as well as its correspondence to transactions and products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Self-citationDeveloping buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Self-citation
Cited by
Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange
Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593110393713 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationUnpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009 · Cited by 836
A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept
Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090561111095676 · Cited by 424
Toward a Service (Eco)Systems Perspective on Value Creation
Wieland, H., Polese, F., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012) · International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology · doi:10.4018/jssmet.2012070102 · Cited by 299
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vargo, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-06-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5/6
- Pages
- 373-379
- ISSN
- 0885-8624 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066106849
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 72.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service‐dominant logic perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/08858620910966255
- The paper
- Vargo, S. L. (2009). Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service‐dominant logic perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620910966255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.