Cited by 424Service and Product InnovationBusiness Strategies and InnovationCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept

Frow, Pennie, Payne, Adrian·2011·European Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Purpose: The value proposition concept and the stakeholder perspective have received relatively little attention within Service‐Dominant (S‐D) logic. This paper sets out to explore value propositions in the context of S‐D logic, within the multiple stakeholder domains that form part of a marketing system. Its purpose is to identify how use of the value proposition concept, in this broader context, provides new insight into value creation within a value network. Design/methodology/approach: This paper explores the development of value propositions in key stakeholder market domains. A five‐step process is developed for identifying key stakeholders and co‐creating value propositions for them within a marketing system. Findings: Value propositions have a key role in co‐creation of value between stakeholders. The development of value propositions in multiple stakeholder domains can provide an important mechanism for aligning value within a marketing system. Practical implications: Stakeholder value propositions provide enhanced opportunities for value co‐creation and can assist managers in aligning value and stabilizing relationships within an organization's value network. Originality/value: This paper considers a broader view of value through creation of value propositions for key stakeholders. An iterative framework is proposed that couples the stakeholder concept and value co‐creation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/03090561111095676

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Taking into account all stakeholders and their interrelationships helps firms to better understand how to deal with complex value exchange.

    “Taking into account all stakeholders and their interrelationships helps firms to better understand how to deal with complex value exchange (Bhattacharya and Korschun 2008;Frow and Payne 2011;Layton 2007).”

    From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Frow and Payne 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frow, P., & Payne, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
European Journal of Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-02-15
Volume
45
Issue
1/2
Pages
223-240
ISSN
0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070669899
Cited by
424
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
66.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
value proposition, stakeholder perspectives, service-dominant logic, value co-creation, value networks, marketing systems, stakeholder identification, value alignment, stakeholder relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review