Cited by 218Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyService and Product InnovationAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Equity and repurchase intention following service failure

Palmer, Adrian, Beggs, Rosalind, Keown‐McMullan, Caroline·2000·Journal of Services Marketing

Abstract

Failure to consistently deliver promises is a likely outcome for high contact services. While many organizations create blueprints to recover from service failures, these tend to focus on production processes rather than the individual needs of customers. Develops a framework based on equity, for studying the effects on customers of service failure and recovery. In a study of restaurant customers, the construct of equity is found to be significantly correlated with respondents’ intention to repurchase. Significant differences in equity were observed between genders and age groups, suggesting that service recovery processes should be more closely tailored to the demographic characteristics of customers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/08876040010347624

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1080/02642069200000042 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/0267257X.1994.9964304 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354 · DOI
  4. Bird, D. (1998), “Room for much improvement in levels of service”,Marketing, April 16, pp. 15‐16
  5. 10.2307/1251871 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/1251919 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/1252174 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/3152091 · DOI
  9. 10.1108/09564239710166245 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0022-4359(05)80006-5 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/3151847 · DOI
  12. 10.1108/09596119810222104 · DOI
  13. Clemmer, E.C. and Schneider, B. (1993), “Managing customer dissatisfaction with waiting: applying social psychological theory in a service setting”,Advances in Services Marketing and Management, Vol. 2, pp. 213‐29.
  14. 10.1086/209341 · DOI
  15. Curry, L. (1995), “Menu for change wins customers”,People Management, Vol. 1 No. 22, November 2, pp. 40‐2. · DOI
  16. 10.2307/1251126 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1108/09564239210019450 · DOI
  18. Feinberg, R.A. Widdows, R. Hirch‐Wyncott, M. and Trappey, C. (1990), “Myth and reality in customer service: good and bad service sometimes leads to repurchase”,Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, No. 3, pp. 112‐14.
  19. 10.1086/209091 · DOI
  20. Goode, M. and Moutinho, L. (1994), “The effect of consumers age on overall satisfaction: an application to financial services”,Academy of Marketing Annual Conference, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, pp. 426‐32.
  21. Granbois, D. Summers, J.O. and Frazier, G.L. (1977), “Correlates of consumer expectations and complaining behaviour”, in Day, R.L. (Ed.),Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behaviour, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, pp. 18‐25.
  22. Green, E. (1997), “Strange but true: there really is a restaurant whose service is worse than John Cleese could have imagined”,New Statesman, Vol. 126 No. 4326, p. 35.
  23. 10.1016/0148-2963(90)90037-E · DOI
  24. 10.1007/BF02893863 · DOI
  25. Guest, D. (1989), “Personnel and HRM: can you tell the difference?”,Personnel Management, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 48‐52
  26. 10.1108/08876049310026088 · DOI
  27. Hart, C.W.L. Sasser, W.E. Jr and Heskett, J.L. (1990), “The profitable art of service recovery”,Harvard Business Review, July‐August, pp. 148‐56.
  28. 10.1108/08876049510086017 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/0092070394221005 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lewis, R. (1981), “Restaurant advertising: appeals and consumers’ intentions”,Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 20‐7.
  31. O’Brien, L and Jones, C. (1995), “Do rewards really create loyalty?”,Harvard Business Review, May‐June, pp. 75‐82.
  32. Oliver, R (1996), “Equity: how consumers interpret fairness”, in Oliver, R (Ed.),Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, McGraw Hill Series in Marketing, McGraw‐Hill, USA, pp. 193‐215.
  33. 10.1080/0267257X.1994.9964296 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0022-4359(05)80007-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00127.x · DOI · Paper page
  36. Shostack, G.L. (1984), “Designing services that deliver”,Harvard Business Review, January‐February, pp. 133‐9
  37. Smith, R.B. and Moschis, G.P. (1990), “The socialization of approach to the study of the elderly consumer”, in Zeithaml, V. (Ed.),Review of Marketing, American Marketing Association, pp. 190‐226.
  38. 10.1108/08876049510079853 · DOI
  39. 10.1086/209322 · DOI
  40. 10.2307/3151833 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Palmer, A., Beggs, R., & Keown‐McMullan, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Gloucestershire (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Venue
Journal of Services Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2000-11
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
513-528
ISSN
0887-6045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977161855
Cited by
218
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Services Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
equity theory, service failure, service recovery, repurchase intention, restaurant customers, demographic differences, gender differences, age differences, customer satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review