The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual web site disclosures
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the presentation medium of corporate social and environmental web site disclosure has an impact on user trust in such disclosure, and to examine the effect of media richness on user perception about corporate social and environmental responsibility. Design/methodology/approach: The paper's methodology is a three‐by‐two between‐subjects design experiment, manipulating presentation medium and industry type. Participants viewed social and environmental web site disclosures and completed and communicated their perceptions of trust and the experimental companies' corporate social responsibility. Findings: The presentation medium richness of social and environmental web site disclosures is positively associated with: trusting intentions, but not trusting beliefs, of web site users; and user perception of corporate social and environmental responsibility. Research limitations/implications: As with all controlled experiments, the research design focused on internal validity to maintain control over the task design, manipulation, and measurement of variables. While this required trade‐offs with external validity, the task was designed based on real‐world scenarios to maintain high levels of external validity within the experimental setting. Practical implications: The paper provides evidence that corporations could use enhanced web‐based technology to potentially mislead users regarding their performance in the social domain. Originality/value: The paper extends the visual disclosure literature by examining the richness of the image/visual media, and investigates whether user perceptions are impacted by the variations in its richness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9781410610904 · Cited by 6,235
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x · Cited by 400
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Agarwal, R. and Venkatesh, V. (2002), “Assessing a firm's web presence: a heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement usability”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 168‐86. · DOI · Paper page
- Aho, J.A. (1985), “Rhetoric and the invention of double entry bookkeeping”, Rhetorica, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 21‐43. · DOI
- Bentler, P.M. and Bonnett, D.G. (1990), “Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 88, pp. 588‐606. · DOI · Paper page
- Bryant, S.M., Hunton, J.E. and Stone, D.N. (2004), “Internet‐based experiments: possibilities for behavioral accounting research”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 107‐30. · DOI
- Cho, C.H., Patten, D.M. and Roberts, R.W. (2006), “Corporate political strategy: an examination of the relation between political expenditures, environmental performance, and environmental disclosure”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 67 No. 2, pp. 139‐54. · DOI · Paper page
- Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H. and Trevino, L.K. (1987), “Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 355‐66. · DOI · Paper page
- Davison, J. (2007), “Photographs and accountability: cracking the codes of an NGO”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 133‐58. · DOI
- Deegan, C. (2002), “Introduction: The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 282‐311. · DOI · Paper page
- Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975), “Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior”, Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 18, pp. 122‐36. · DOI · Paper page
- Froehle, C.M. (2006), “Service personnel, technology, and their interaction in influencing customer satisfaction”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 5‐38. · DOI · Paper page
- Gallhofer, S. and Haslam, J. (1991), “The aura of accounting in the context of a crisis: Germany and the First World War”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 5/6, pp. 487‐520. · DOI · Paper page
- Gallhofer, S., Haslam, J., Monk, E. and Roberts, C. (2006), “The emancipatory potential of online reporting: the case of counter accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 681‐718. · DOI · Paper page
- Hood, R. (1963), “The annual report as a design challenge”, Graphis, May, pp. 184‐201.
- Howard, E. (1991), “Preparing annual reports in the 1990s”, Public Relations Journal, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 26‐7.
- Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999), “Communication and trust in global virtual teams”, Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 791‐815. · DOI · Paper page
- Jones, K., Alabaster, T. and Walton, J. (1998), “Virtual environments for environmental reporting”, Greener Management International, Vol. 21, pp. 121‐37.
- Koreto, R.J. (1997), “When the bottom line is online”, Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 183 No. 3, pp. 63‐5.
- Lewis, R. (1984), “Annual reports of the future”, Communications Arts, September/October, pp. 24‐8.
- Lodhia, S.K. (2004a), “Corporate environmental reporting media: a case for the World Wide Web”, Electronic Green Journal, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 1‐16. · DOI
- Lodhia, S.K. (2004b), “Legitimacy motives for World Wide Web (WWW) environmental reporting: an exploratory study into present practices in the Australian minerals industry”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 4, pp. 1‐16.
- McKinstry, S. (1996), “Designing the annual reports of Burton plc from 1930 to 1994”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 89‐111. · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(95)00016-3
- McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L. and Chervany, N.L. (1998), “Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 473‐90. · DOI · Paper page
- Milne, M.J. and Patten, D.M. (2002), “Securing organizational legitimacy: an experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 372‐405. · DOI · Paper page
- Paisey, C. and Paisey, N.J. (2006), “And they all lived happily ever after? Exploring the possibilities of mobilising the internet to promote a more enabling accounting for occupational pension schemes”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 719‐58. · doi:10.1108/09513570610689677
- Palmer, J.W. (2002), “Web site usability, design, and performance metrics”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 151‐67. · DOI · Paper page
- Patten, D.M. (1991), “Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 23‐34. · DOI · Paper page
- Patten, D.M. (2002), “The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 763‐73. · DOI · Paper page
- Patten, D.M. and Crampton, W. (2004), “Legitimacy and the internet: an examination of corporate web page environmental disclosures”, Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, Vol. 2, pp. 31‐57. · DOI · Paper page
- Pettit, G. (1990), “Creating an annual report that's on the money”, Across the Board, 27 June, pp. 62‐3.
- Preston, A.M., Wright, C. and Young, J.J. (1996), “Imag[in]ing annual reports”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 113‐37. · DOI · Paper page
- Sikka, P. (2006), “The internet and possibilities for counter accounts: some reflections”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 759‐69. · doi:10.1108/09513570610689686
- SustainAbility/UNEP (1999), The Internet Reporting Report, The Beacon Press, London.
- Trevino, L.K., Lengel, R.H. and Daft, R.L. (1987), “Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations”, Communication Research, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 553‐74. · DOI · Paper page
- Valacich, J., Paranka, D. and Nunamaker, J. (1993), “Communication concurrency and the new media”, Communication Research, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 249‐76. · DOI · Paper page
- van Koert, R. (2003), “E‐media in development: Combining multiple e‐media types”, First Monday, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 1‐14. · doi:10.5210/fm.v8i2.1034
- Warren, S. (2002), “’Show me how it feels to work here: using photography to research organizational aesthetics”, Ephemera, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 224‐45.
Cited by
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 · Cited by 1,923
The language of US corporate environmental disclosure
Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002 · Cited by 836
Self-citationDo actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation
Cho, C. H., Guidry, R. P., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M. (2012) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.12.001 · Cited by 652
Self-citationGreenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions
Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Lazzini, A. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2373 · Cited by 577
Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D. C., & van Leeuwen, T. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.781867 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Cho, C. H., Phillips, J. R., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-07-31
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 933-952
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1578607024
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual web site disclosures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513570910980481
- The paper
- Cho, C. H., Phillips, J. R., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M. (2009). Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual web site disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910980481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.