Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual web site disclosures

Cho, Charles H., Phillips, Jillian R., Hageman, Amy M., Patten, Dennis M.·2009·Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the presentation medium of corporate social and environmental web site disclosure has an impact on user trust in such disclosure, and to examine the effect of media richness on user perception about corporate social and environmental responsibility. Design/methodology/approach: The paper's methodology is a three‐by‐two between‐subjects design experiment, manipulating presentation medium and industry type. Participants viewed social and environmental web site disclosures and completed and communicated their perceptions of trust and the experimental companies' corporate social responsibility. Findings: The presentation medium richness of social and environmental web site disclosures is positively associated with: trusting intentions, but not trusting beliefs, of web site users; and user perception of corporate social and environmental responsibility. Research limitations/implications: As with all controlled experiments, the research design focused on internal validity to maintain control over the task design, manipulation, and measurement of variables. While this required trade‐offs with external validity, the task was designed based on real‐world scenarios to maintain high levels of external validity within the experimental setting. Practical implications: The paper provides evidence that corporations could use enhanced web‐based technology to potentially mislead users regarding their performance in the social domain. Originality/value: The paper extends the visual disclosure literature by examining the richness of the image/visual media, and investigates whether user perceptions are impacted by the variations in its richness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09513570910980481

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Agarwal, R. and Venkatesh, V. (2002), “Assessing a firm's web presence: a heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement usability”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 168‐86. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aho, J.A. (1985), “Rhetoric and the invention of double entry bookkeeping”, Rhetorica, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 21‐43. · DOI
  3. Bentler, P.M. and Bonnett, D.G. (1990), “Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 88, pp. 588‐606. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bryant, S.M., Hunton, J.E. and Stone, D.N. (2004), “Internet‐based experiments: possibilities for behavioral accounting research”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 107‐30. · DOI
  5. Cho, C.H., Patten, D.M. and Roberts, R.W. (2006), “Corporate political strategy: an examination of the relation between political expenditures, environmental performance, and environmental disclosure”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 67 No. 2, pp. 139‐54. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H. and Trevino, L.K. (1987), “Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 355‐66. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Davison, J. (2007), “Photographs and accountability: cracking the codes of an NGO”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 133‐58. · DOI
  8. Deegan, C. (2002), “Introduction: The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 282‐311. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975), “Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior”, Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 18, pp. 122‐36. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Froehle, C.M. (2006), “Service personnel, technology, and their interaction in influencing customer satisfaction”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 5‐38. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gallhofer, S. and Haslam, J. (1991), “The aura of accounting in the context of a crisis: Germany and the First World War”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 5/6, pp. 487‐520. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gallhofer, S., Haslam, J., Monk, E. and Roberts, C. (2006), “The emancipatory potential of online reporting: the case of counter accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 681‐718. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hood, R. (1963), “The annual report as a design challenge”, Graphis, May, pp. 184‐201.
  14. Howard, E. (1991), “Preparing annual reports in the 1990s”, Public Relations Journal, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 26‐7.
  15. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999), “Communication and trust in global virtual teams”, Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 791‐815. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jones, K., Alabaster, T. and Walton, J. (1998), “Virtual environments for environmental reporting”, Greener Management International, Vol. 21, pp. 121‐37.
  17. Koreto, R.J. (1997), “When the bottom line is online”, Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 183 No. 3, pp. 63‐5.
  18. Lewis, R. (1984), “Annual reports of the future”, Communications Arts, September/October, pp. 24‐8.
  19. Lodhia, S.K. (2004a), “Corporate environmental reporting media: a case for the World Wide Web”, Electronic Green Journal, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 1‐16. · DOI
  20. Lodhia, S.K. (2004b), “Legitimacy motives for World Wide Web (WWW) environmental reporting: an exploratory study into present practices in the Australian minerals industry”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 4, pp. 1‐16.
  21. McKinstry, S. (1996), “Designing the annual reports of Burton plc from 1930 to 1994”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 89‐111. · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(95)00016-3
  22. McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L. and Chervany, N.L. (1998), “Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 473‐90. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Milne, M.J. and Patten, D.M. (2002), “Securing organizational legitimacy: an experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 372‐405. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Paisey, C. and Paisey, N.J. (2006), “And they all lived happily ever after? Exploring the possibilities of mobilising the internet to promote a more enabling accounting for occupational pension schemes”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 719‐58. · doi:10.1108/09513570610689677
  25. Palmer, J.W. (2002), “Web site usability, design, and performance metrics”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 151‐67. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Patten, D.M. (1991), “Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 23‐34. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Patten, D.M. (2002), “The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 763‐73. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Patten, D.M. and Crampton, W. (2004), “Legitimacy and the internet: an examination of corporate web page environmental disclosures”, Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, Vol. 2, pp. 31‐57. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Pettit, G. (1990), “Creating an annual report that's on the money”, Across the Board, 27 June, pp. 62‐3.
  30. Preston, A.M., Wright, C. and Young, J.J. (1996), “Imag[in]ing annual reports”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 113‐37. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Sikka, P. (2006), “The internet and possibilities for counter accounts: some reflections”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 759‐69. · doi:10.1108/09513570610689686
  32. SustainAbility/UNEP (1999), The Internet Reporting Report, The Beacon Press, London.
  33. Trevino, L.K., Lengel, R.H. and Daft, R.L. (1987), “Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations”, Communication Research, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 553‐74. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Valacich, J., Paranka, D. and Nunamaker, J. (1993), “Communication concurrency and the new media”, Communication Research, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 249‐76. · DOI · Paper page
  35. van Koert, R. (2003), “E‐media in development: Combining multiple e‐media types”, First Monday, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 1‐14. · doi:10.5210/fm.v8i2.1034
  36. Warren, S. (2002), “’Show me how it feels to work here: using photography to research organizational aesthetics”, Ephemera, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 224‐45.

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Cho, C. H., Phillips, J. R., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M.
Venue
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-07-31
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
933-952
ISSN
0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1578607024
Cited by
179
References
7
FWCI
16.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual web site disclosures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513570910980481
The paper
Cho, C. H., Phillips, J. R., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M. (2009). Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual web site disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910980481

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.