Cited by 1,296Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorManagement and Organizational Studies

Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships

McKnight, D. Harrison, Cummings, Larry L., Chervany, Norman L.·1998·The Academy of Management Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/259290

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L.
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1998-07
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
473
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4248074997
Cited by
1,296
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 40
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
trust formation, interorganizational relationships, relationship building, trust building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review