The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Past progress and future directions in conceptualizing customer perceived value
Abstract
Purpose: To propose an alternative model specification for better conceptualizing the definition of a customer perceived value construct, and to discuss the theoretical justification of the model. Design/methodology/approach: The proposed model was elaborated based on theoretical contexts. Three models of different conceptualization specifications were estimated and compared with eTail service value survey data. Findings: Based on theory, perceived value should be conceived as a formative construct. The empirical results demonstrated different parameter estimates and thus conclusions are drawn from different conceptualization methods. Research limitations/implications: Future research is suggested to apply the proposed formative value model in other marketing settings, and to explore the role of consumer satisfaction in post‐purchase behavior. Practical implications: Marketing resources allocation and communication programs may be influenced due to different conceptualization methods of value construct applied by practitioners. Originality/value: This paper provides a theoretical rationale for conceptualizing perceived value with formative specification. It stresses that the theoretical justification is a major concern for determining conceptualization models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305 · Cited by 3,618
eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality
Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00034-4 · Cited by 2,340
The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1999) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(99)80005-0 · Cited by 1,675
Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: an integrative analytical framework
Edwards, J. R. (2001) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810142004 · Cited by 1,128
The dangers of poor construct conceptualization
MacKenzie, S. B. (2003) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070303031003011 · Cited by 426
An exploratory study of service value in the USA and Ecuador
Brady, M. K., & Robertson, C. J. (1999) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564239910289003 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Chiu, C., Wang, E. T. G., Fang, Y., & Huang, H. (2014) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00407.x · Cited by 1,332
Service value revisited: Specifying a higher-order, formative measure
Ruiz, D. M., Gremler, D. D., Washburn, J. H., & Carrión, G. C. (2008) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.015 · Cited by 361
Wang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, S., & Wang, J. (2019) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.044 · Cited by 334
Context and mobile services' value-in-use
Gummerus, J., & Pihlström, M. (2011) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.07.002 · Cited by 161
Shopping trip value: do stores and products matter?
Diep, V. C. S., & Sweeney, J. C. (2008) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.10.002 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, C., Sher, P. J., & Shih, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Service Industry Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 318-336
- ISSN
- 0956-4233 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025387955
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 19.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Past progress and future directions in conceptualizing customer perceived value. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09564230510613988
- The paper
- Lin, C., Sher, P. J., & Shih, H. (2005). Past progress and future directions in conceptualizing customer perceived value. International Journal of Service Industry Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230510613988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.