The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective
Abstract
Purpose: This paper seeks to understand business requirements for supply chain risk management (SCRM) from a practitioner perspective. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the findings from an exploratory quantitative survey and qualitative focus group discussions with supply chain managers, some issues of SCRM are derived and structured along the three conceptual levels of “philosophy”, “principles” and “processes”. Findings: The survey showed that 44 per cent of all eight responding companies expect the vulnerability of their supply chains to increase in the next five years. However, the concept of SCRM is still in its infancy. Originality/value: The paper contributes to our knowledge on SCRM by presenting the business requirements from a practitioner perspective and by deriving a structure for an integrated approach to SCRM which can guide further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Cited by
Global supply chain risk management strategies
Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030810866986 · Cited by 1,252
An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability
Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2006) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2007.01.004 · Cited by 787
An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry
Thun, J.-H., & Hoenig, D. (2011) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.010 · Cited by 733
Organisational resilience: development of a conceptual framework for organisational responses
Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.563827 · Cited by 704
Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Jüttner, U.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-141
- ISSN
- 0957-4093 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142616543
- Cited by
- 1,025
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 59.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09574090510617385
- The paper
- Jüttner, U. (2005). Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090510617385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
