CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 694Technology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The theory of planned behavior and Internet purchasing

George, Joey F.·2004·Internet Research
DOI 10.1108/10662240410542634
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Several opinion polls have found that many consumers resist making purchases via the Internet because of their concerns about the privacy of the personal information they provide to Internet merchants. Using the theory of planned behavior as its basis, this study investigated the relationships among beliefs about Internet privacy and trustworthiness, along with beliefs about perceived behavioral control and the expectations of important others, and online purchasing behavior. Data were collected from 193 college students. Analysis of the data indicates that beliefs about trustworthiness positively affect attitudes toward buying online, which in turn positively affect purchasing behavior. Beliefs about self‐efficacy regarding purchasing positively affect perceived behavioral control, which in turn affects online purchasing behavior. In short, respondents who believed in the trustworthiness of the Internet and in their own abilities to buy online were more likely to make Internet purchases than were those without such beliefs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/10662240410542634

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Better Business Bureau (2001), “Third‐party assurance boosts online purchasing”, available at: www.bbbonline.org/about/press/2001/101701.asp (accessed July 1, 2002).
  2. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Todd, P.A. (1997a), “Is there a future for retailing on the Internet?”, in Peterson, R.A. (Ed.), Electronic Marketing and the Consumer, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 139‐54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 692

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
George, J. F.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
George, Joey F.
ORCID
George, Joey F.
Venue
Internet Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2004-07-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
198-212
ISSN
1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/10662240410542634
OpenAlex
W2135060430
Cited by
694
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 31
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Internet Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
theory of planned behavior, online shopping, online privacy, trustworthiness, perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, consumer behavior, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review