Cited by 70Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesBehavioral Health and InterventionsMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy

Self‐regulation and effort in entrepreneurial tasks

Open access
Trevelyan, Rose·2011·International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research

Abstract

Purpose The central question of this paper is, “What determines an entrepreneur's effort on different tasks?” The paper aims to address this question. Design/methodology/approach Propositions about the impact cognitive processes have on entrepreneurial effort across different tasks are developed. These propositions draw on self‐regulatory theory, in particular our understanding of regulatory focus and self‐efficacy. Findings It is argued that a promotion orientation motivates effort on explorative tasks, and a prevention orientation motivates effort on exploitative tasks. Further, it is proposed that high self‐efficacy motivates effort on action tasks, but high self‐efficacy reduces effort on judgment tasks. Practical implications One implication of these propositions for entrepreneurs is to understand self‐regulatory processes and to consciously decide how much effort to put into different tasks, rather than relying on (hidden) preferences. Another implication is for those involved in selecting and developing entrepreneurs. That implication is that entrepreneurs' self‐regulatory processes can inhibit effective effort. These processes can be managed to increase effectiveness. Originality/value By introducing task type into the discussion of self‐regulation and entrepreneurial effort, a more fine‐grained understanding of cognitive processes in actual entrepreneurial activities is developed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13552551111107507

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trevelyan, R.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Trevelyan, Rose
Venue
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
39-63
ISSN
1355-2554 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017826722
Cited by
70
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Keywords
entrepreneurial effort, self-regulation, regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, self-efficacy, judgment tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review