Self‐regulation and effort in entrepreneurial tasks
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The central question of this paper is, “What determines an entrepreneur's effort on different tasks?” The paper aims to address this question. Design/methodology/approach Propositions about the impact cognitive processes have on entrepreneurial effort across different tasks are developed. These propositions draw on self‐regulatory theory, in particular our understanding of regulatory focus and self‐efficacy. Findings It is argued that a promotion orientation motivates effort on explorative tasks, and a prevention orientation motivates effort on exploitative tasks. Further, it is proposed that high self‐efficacy motivates effort on action tasks, but high self‐efficacy reduces effort on judgment tasks. Practical implications One implication of these propositions for entrepreneurs is to understand self‐regulatory processes and to consciously decide how much effort to put into different tasks, rather than relying on (hidden) preferences. Another implication is for those involved in selecting and developing entrepreneurs. That implication is that entrepreneurs' self‐regulatory processes can inhibit effective effort. These processes can be managed to increase effectiveness. Originality/value By introducing task type into the discussion of self‐regulation and entrepreneurial effort, a more fine‐grained understanding of cognitive processes in actual entrepreneurial activities is developed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Entrepreneurial self-efficacy can lead to goal commitment and task effort.
“Scholars have shown that entrepreneurial self-efficacy can lead to opportunity recognition (Tumasjan & Braun, 2012), goal commitment and task effort (Trevelyan, 2011), persistence (Cardon & Kirk, 2015), and innovation (Cumberland et al., 2015).”
From The impact of growth mindset training on entrepreneurial action among necessity entrepreneurs: Evidence from a randomized control trial (2023) · cites this paper as Trevelyan, 2011
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810 · see citing works
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · cited 1× · see citing works
“cludes such things as refinement, choice, production, efficiency, selection, implementation and execution” ( March, 1991”
Higgins, E. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280 · Cited by 6,775 · see citing works
Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00029-3 · Cited by 3,047 · see citing works
The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions.
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265 · Cited by 2,996 · see citing works
Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x · Cited by 1,983 · see citing works
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy: Refining the Measure
McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00304.x · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works
Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work
Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2972 · Cited by 964 · see citing works
Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24870 · Cited by 953 · see citing works
Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: a meta-analysis
Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.416 · Cited by 598 · cited 1× · see citing works
“), perceived complexity and difficulty of task ( Wood et al. , 1987”
Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit.
Louro, M. J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.174 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morris, S., Carlos, C., Kistruck, G. M., Lount, R. B., & Thomas, T. E. (2023) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1472 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Trevelyan, R.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Trevelyan, Rose
- Venue
- International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-02-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-63
- ISSN
- 1355-2554 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017826722
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial effort, self-regulation, regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, self-efficacy, judgment tasks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review