The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management: a path analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The primary purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between the level of trust and several relevant constructs drawn from transaction cost analysis (such as asset specificity, behavioral uncertainty, and partner's opportunism) and social exchange theory (informational sharing). Design/methodology/approach: A comprehensive questionnaire based on various theories on trust and commitment was mailed in 2001 to supply chain practitioners in the Midwest region. A total of 171 valid returns were received out of 1,800 mailings (9.5 percent). A path analysis was used to estimate parameters or relationship between relevant constructs and trust, and trust with the level of commitment. Findings: A firm's trust in their supply chain partner is highly associated with both parties’ specific asset investments and social exchange theory. Information sharing has a primary impact on reducing (improving a partner's uncertainty behavior which, in turn, would improve the level of trust. Finally, the level of commitment is strongly related to the level of trust, supporting Morgan and Hunt's hypothesis. Research limitations/implications: This research used supply chain practitioners in one region as a target population. It is highly recommended to duplicate this study in other regions to verify the findings. Originality/value: This is the first research paper linking various variables to trust and trust to commitment in supply chain management using path model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
Dugger, W. M. (1987) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.1987.11504638 · Cited by 14,786
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400103 · Cited by 5,826
Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546 · Cited by 4,698
Factors affecting trust in market research relationships
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700106 · Cited by 3,659
Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships
Larson, A. (1992) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393534 · Cited by 2,658
Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.69.3.372 · Cited by 2,234
Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels
Heide, J. B. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800106 · Cited by 2,210
Designing and managing the supply chain : concepts, strategies, and case studies
Simchi‐Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi‐Levi, E. (2000) · Cited by 2,204
Cited by
Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 · Cited by 4,118
A multi‐theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains
Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.004 · Cited by 695
Won Lee, C., Kwon, I. G., & Severance, D. (2007) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598540710826371 · Cited by 450
Self-citationLin, H.-F. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.001 · Cited by 342
Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective
Li, G., Fan, H., Lee, P. K. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwon, I. G., & Suh, T.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058451670
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 28.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management: a path analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13598540510578351
- The paper
- Kwon, I. G., & Suh, T. (2005). Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management: a path analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510578351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.