The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generational differences in China: career implications
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine generational differences in attitudes toward careers in China. Generational differences are quite apparent in Chinese society. People who were born in the 1960s experienced the Cultural Revolution in their childhood. Those born in the 1970s witnessed the dramatic and profound social changes after China's open‐door policy was enforced. The generation born in the 1980s is believed to be the spoiled generation that highly values materialism and self‐realization, due to being the only child in the family as a result of the “One Child” policy. Design/methodology/approach: The authors surveyed Chinese people between 20 and 50 years old about their career attitudes to explore six hypotheses based on predicted patterns of generational change. Findings: The paper found more differences in desired attributes of their manager than in their perception of themselves. Some career attitudes and abilities vary across the three generations but, given the historical and common assumptions of generational change, extensive differences were not found. Research limitations/implications: The authors' sample of 277 can only provide general insights into Chinese attitudes, given the size and diversity of the Chinese population. The study hopes to spur further research into generational differences in China and elsewhere. Practical implications: The paper provides insight into how the generational groups in China currently in the workforce think about their careers. Generational clashes in the workplace are also discussed. Originality/value: No previous projects directly use the studies method or concepts in China. It builds on past work examining work values and career attitudes in China to contribute insights into generational differences within China.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“People of this generation possess some characteristics that are different from those of their parents’ generation.”
From Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation? (2018) · cites this paper as Yi, Ribbens, and Morgan 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- Arsenault, P.M. (2004), “Validating generational differences”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 124‐41. · DOI
- Bian, Y. (2002), “Chinese social stratification and social mobility”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 28, pp. 91‐116. · DOI
- Callanan, G.A. and Greenhaus, J.H. (2008), “The baby boom generation and career management: a call to action”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 70‐85. · DOI
- Chen, S. (1999), A History of Contemporary Chinese Literature, Fudan University Press, Shanghai.
- Chen, Y.X. (1999), “Lost in revolution and reform: the socioeconomic pains of China's red guards generation”, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 8 No. 21, pp. 219‐39. · DOI
- Cheung, E. (2007), Baby Boomers, Generation X and Social Cycles, Longwave Press, Toronto, Canada.
- China Youth Press (1986), Chinese Urban Only Children Personality Development and Education, China Youth Press, Beijing, China.
- Croll, E., Davin, D. and Kane, P. (1985), China's One Child Family Policy, St Martin's Press, New York, NY. · DOI
- Deal, J.J., Altman, D.G. and Rogelberg, S.G. (2010), “Millennials at work: what we know and what we need to do (if anything)”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 191‐9. · DOI
- Ding, D.Z. and Warner, M. (2001), “China's labor‐management system reforms: breaking the ‘three old irons’”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 315‐34. · DOI
- Egri, C.P. and Ralston, D.A. (2004), “Generational cohorts and personal values: a comparison of China and the United States”, Organization Science, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 210‐20. · DOI · Paper page
- Elegant, S. (2007), “China's me generation”, Time, Vol. 170 No. 1, pp. 32‐7.
- Falbo, F. and Polit, D.F. (1986), “Quantitative research of the only child literature: research evidence and theory development”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 100 No. 2, pp. 176‐89. · DOI
- Feng, X. (2000), “The socialization process and results of only children's adolescence”, Chinese Social Sciences, Vol. 6.
- Fletcher, F., Roberts, C., Gibson, C., Gibson, D., Cooke, D.R., Eldridge, L., Hoffman, W. and Mundy, R. (2009), “Generational cohorts and their attitudes toward work related issues in central Kentucky”, working paper series, Social Science Research Network, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1484350. · DOI
- Greenhaus, J.H., Callanan, G.A. and Godshalk, V.M. (2000), Career Management, 3rd ed., The Dryden Press, Fort Worth, TX.
- Harrington, B. and Hall, D.T. (2007), Career Management & Work‐Life Integration: Using Self‐Assessment to Navigate Contemporary Careers, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA. · DOI
- Hess, N. and Jepsen, D.M. (2009), “Career stage and generational differences in psychological contracts”, Career Development International, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 261‐83. · DOI
- Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work‐Related Values, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
- Hofstede, G. (2003), Culture's Consequences, Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
- Hurst, J.L. and Good, L.K. (2009), “Generation Y and career choice: the impact of retail career perceptions, expectations and entitlement perceptions”, Career Development International, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 570‐93. · DOI · Paper page
- Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. · DOI · Paper page
- Kupperschmidt, B.R. (2000), “Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management”, Health Care Manager, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 65‐76. · DOI
- Liu, W.B. (2002), Sheng Yu Qi Shi Nian Dai (Born in the 70s – Their Journeys), China Jiancha Press, Beijing.
- Liu, Y.D. (2005), Hong Di Jin Zi (Golden Characters in Red Background: Beijing Kids in the 60s and 70s), China Youth Press, Beijing.
- Lobel, S.A. and St Clair, L. (1992), “Effects of family responsibilities, gender, and career identity salience on performance outcomes”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 1057‐69. · DOI
- Lu, H.L. (2000), To Be Relatively Comfortable in an Egalitarian Society, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. · DOI
- Lubinski, D., Schmidt, D.B. and Benbow, C.P. (1996), “A 20‐year stability analysis of the study of the values for intellectually gifted individuals from adolescence to adulthood”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81 No. 4, pp. 443‐53. · DOI
- McDonald, P., Brown, K. and Bradley, L. (2005), “Have traditional career paths given way to protean ones? Evidence from senior managers in the Australian public sector”, Career Development International, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 109‐29. · DOI
- Meglino, B.M. and Revlin, E.C. (1998), “Individual values in organizations: concepts, controversies, and research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 351‐89. · DOI
- Pekala, N. (2001), “Conquering the generational divide”, Journal of Property Management, Vol. 66 No. 6, pp. 30‐7.
- Ralston, D.A., Egri, C.P., Stewart, S., Terpstra, R.H. and Yu, K.C. (1999), “Doing business in the 21st century with the new generation of Chinese managers: a study of generational shifts in work values in China”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 415‐28. · DOI
- Rogler, L.H. (2002), “Historical generations and psychology: the case of the great depression and World War II”, The American Psychologist, Vol. 57 No. 12, pp. 1013‐23. · DOI
- Schewe, C.D. and Evans, S.M. (2000), “Market segmentation by cohorts: the value and validity of cohorts in America and abroad”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 16 Nos 1/3, pp. 129‐42. · DOI
- Schwoerer, C.E. (1990), “Individual and organizational predictors of career management”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
- Sears, D.O. (1981), “Life‐stage effects on attitude change, especially among the elderly”, in Kiesler, S.B., Morgan, J.N. and Oppenheimer, V.R. (Eds), Aging: Social Change, Academic Press, New York, NY.
- Sekaran, U. (1986), “Significant differences in quality of life factors and their correlates: a function of differences in career orientations or gender”, Sex Roles, Vol. 14 Nos 5‐6, pp. 261‐79. · DOI
- Sloman, M. (2007), “Chinese puzzle”, People Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 40‐3.
- Sullivan, S.E., Forret, M.L., Carraher, S.M. and Mainiero, L.A. (2009), “Using the kaleidoscope career model to examine generational differences in work attitudes”, Career Development International, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 284‐302. · DOI
- Tu, H.S., Forret, M.L. and Sullivan, S.E. (2006), “Careers in a non‐Western context: an exploratory empirical investigation of factors related to the career success of Chinese managers”, Career Development International, Vol. 11 No. 7, pp. 580‐93. · DOI
- Twenge, J.M. (2010), “A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 201‐10. · DOI · Paper page
- Vohra, R. (2000), China's Path to Modernization: A Historical Review from 1800 to the Present, Prentice‐Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- Warner, M. (2004), “Human resource management in China revisited: introduction”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 15 Nos 4/5, pp. 617‐34. · DOI
- Wolburg, J.M. and Pokrywczynski, J. (2001), “A psychographic analysis of generation Y college students”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 33‐53. · DOI
- Wong, A.L.Y. and Slater, J.R. (2002), “Executive development in China: is there any in a Western sense?”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 338‐60. · DOI
- Yang, D. (1997), “Generational conflicts and the one child generation”, Youth Studies, Vol. 12.
- Yao, S. (2000), “Economic development and poverty reductions in China over 20 years of reforms”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 447‐74. · DOI
- Zhu, C.J. and Dowling, P.J. (2002), “Staffing practices in transition: some empirical evidence from China”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 569‐97. · DOI
Cited by
Leadership and generations at work: A critical review
Rudolph, C. W., Rauvola, R. S., & Zacher, H. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.004 · Cited by 224
Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation?
Wang, Q. (2018) · China Perspectives · doi:10.4000/chinaperspectives.8165 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Yi, X., Ribbens, B., & Morgan, C. N.
- Affiliations
- Western Illinois University (US)
- ORCID
- Yi, Xiang
- Venue
- Career Development International
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-10-26
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 601-620
- ISSN
- 1362-0436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998073066
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Career Development International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Keywords
- generational differences, career attitudes, one-child policy, only children, materialism, self-realization, self-perception, work values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.