Cited by 171Innovative Education and Learning PracticesOrganizational Learning and LeadershipInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice

Kerosuo, Hannele, Engeström, Yrjö·2003·Journal of Workplace Learning

Abstract

The following theoretical challenges concerning learning in organizations and at work are examined in the study. First, organizational learning is not only the formation of collective routines; it is also tool‐creation and implementation. Second, tools evolve as they are implemented. Third, tools become powerful when they become an interconnected instrumentality and constellations. Tool‐creation and implementation are examined when a new set of tools is being appropriated for collaboration between primary and secondary health care. Boundary crossings in the interaction of the multiple providers are focused as an essential context of tool‐creation during implementation. The findings concerning the tool‐creation during implementation process include the productivity of the resistance, the importance of turning points, the formation of the new instrumentality, the discovery of gaps, and the necessity of stabilization and maintenance in organizational learning. Finally, conclusions about learning in the creation of work practice will be proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13665620310504837

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One major challenge in medical work today is fragmentation of care, or fragmentation of the object, especially salient in care of patients with multiple chronic conditions.

    “One of the major challenges in medical work today is the fragmentation of care, or in activity-theoretical terms, the fragmentation of the object, especially salient in the care of patients with multiple chronic conditions (Kerosuo and Engeström 2003;Engeström 2018;Meijer et al. 2020, in press).”

    From Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning (2021) · cites this paper as Kerosuo and Engeström 2003

  • In multiple cycles of expansive learning, practitioners and patients generated a new instrument called the care agreement, initiated by a physician who noticed fragmentation in the care of a patient with multiple chronic illnesses.

    “In multiple cycles of expansive learning, practitioners and patients generated a new instrument called the care agreement initiated by a physician who noticed fragmentation in the care of a patient with multiple chronic illnesses (Kerosuo and Engeström 2003).”

    From Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning (2021) · cites this paper as Kerosuo and Engeström 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Journal of Workplace Learning
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
15
Issue
7/8
Pages
345-351
ISSN
1366-5626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158668668
Cited by
171
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Workplace Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
boundary crossing, organizational learning, tool implementation, work practices, instrumentality, constellations, resistance, turning points, workplace learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review