The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of team climate and empowering leadership on team members' knowledge‐sharing behavior. Design/methodology/approach: A research model was developed based on prior knowledge management studies. Survey data were collected from 434 college students at a major US university, who took courses that required team projects. The partial least squares technique was applied to test the research model. Findings: Team climate and empowering leadership significantly influence individuals' knowledge‐sharing behavior by affecting their attitude toward knowledge sharing. These two constructs also have significant direct effects on the knowledge‐sharing behavior. Research limitations/implications: The student sample and US setting might limit the generalizability of the findings. Nonetheless, this study is based on and extends prior research, which provides a deepened understanding of knowledge sharing in the team context. Practical implications: This research has practical implications for how to design teams to facilitate knowledge sharing. It suggests that cohesive, innovative teams with members trusting one another and led by empowering leaders will have a higher level of knowledge sharing. Originality/value: This research originally examines the effects of both team climate and empowering leadership on knowledge sharing. Little prior research has carried out such an integrated analysis. This paper will have significant value for organizations trying to redesign teams to enhance knowledge management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921
Self-citationIntention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x · Cited by 3,410 · cited 1×
“3 (Diamantopoulos and Siguaw, 2006).”
Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework
Ipe, M. (2003) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484303257985 · Cited by 1,608
Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research1
Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148814 · Cited by 32
Cited by
A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges
Asrar-ul-Haq, M., & Anwar, S. (2016) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744 · Cited by 361
Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review
A.F. Ragab, M., & Arisha, A. (2013) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-12-2012-0381 · Cited by 323
Naqshbandi, M. M., & Tabche, I. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.017 · Cited by 308
Investigating the resistance to telemedicine in Ethiopia
Xue, Y., Liang, H., Mbarika, V., Hauser, R., Schwager, P., & Kassa Getahun, M. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.04.005 · Cited by 59
Self-citationJada, U. R., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-11-2017-0365 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-04-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 299-312
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074141158
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 56.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13673271111119709
- The paper
- Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.