The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A measurement scale for product innovation performance
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a study aimed at conceptualising and developing valid measurements for two key dimensions of product innovation performance‐efficacy and efficiency – in the context of firm competition. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from French biotechnology firms. Using structural equations modeling, the constructs’ measurement models were tested and the scale was validated. Findings: The results of the study indicate that the operational measures developed here satisfy the criteria for unidimensionality, reliability, and validity. Research limitations/implications: This study contributes to innovation management research by providing a set of valid and reliable operational measures. These measures are expected to help researchers in theory testing. Because of the sample features, final results should be considered with caution. Practical implications: The proposed measurement scale for product innovation performance could be implemented as an innovation audit tool. Originality/value: This paper provides a new measurement instrument for product innovation performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Cited by
Ritala, P. (2012) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00741.x · Cited by 571
Dobni, C. B. (2008) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/14601060810911156 · Cited by 566
Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12005 · Cited by 450
Self-citationStartups and open innovation: a review of the literature
Spender, J.-C., Corvello, V., Grimaldi, M., & Rippa, P. (2017) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-12-2015-0131 · Cited by 432
Cabello-Medina, C., López-Cabrales, Á., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.555125 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., & Chiva, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 333-346
- ISSN
- 1460-1060 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971224238
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A measurement scale for product innovation performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14601060610707812
- The paper
- Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., & Chiva, R. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610707812
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
