The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coopetition Strategy – When is it Successful? Empirical Evidence on Innovation and Market Performance
Open accessAbstract
Coopetition (collaboration between competing firms) has been viewed as a potentially beneficial but also a risky relationship for a firm. Earlier literature provides inconclusive evidence in terms of the effects of a firm's coopetition strategy on innovation and market performance, suggesting both positive and negative implications. Some of this variation could be attributed to the fact that coopetition is successful only in certain types of business environment. In order to take the research further, this study examines the effect of a coopetition strategy on the firm's innovation and market performance, focusing on the moderating effects of market uncertainty, network externalities and competitive intensity. The results from a cross‐industry survey of 209 Finnish firms provide novel evidence on the conditions under which coopetition is successful and when it is not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,705
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,701
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Competitive advantage, creating and sustaining superior performance
Weil, K. E. (1985) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 10,284
Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility
Katz, M. L. (1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 6,052
Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study
Ahuja, G. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667105 · Cited by 5,079
Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances
Hamel, G. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250120908 · Cited by 4,315
THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON PERCEPTIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE.
DELANEY, J. T., & HUSELID, M. A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256718 · Cited by 3,147
Cited by
Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions
Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. (2015) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-015-0168-6 · Cited by 710
Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com
Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.005 · Cited by 408
Self-citationA systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding
Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003 · Cited by 401
Nuances in the Interplay of Competition and Cooperation: Towards a Theory of Coopetition
Gnyawali, D. R., & Ryan Charleton, T. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318788945 · Cited by 391
Estrada, I., Faems, D., & de Faria, P. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.013 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritala, P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-324
- ISSN
- 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8551
- OpenAlex
- W1835063669
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 36.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coopetition Strategy – When is it Successful? Empirical Evidence on Innovation and Market Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00741.x
- The paper
- Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition Strategy – When is it Successful? Empirical Evidence on Innovation and Market Performance. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00741.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
