The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the field of open innovation
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the emerging research field of open innovation and identify where the field is going as well as suggest future fields of research. Design/methodology/approach: All academic papers and books published until November 2007 under the label of open innovation were systematically reviewed. Also, nine key researchers were asked to contribute with their opinions on the research frontier. Findings: A number of key themes in the research were identified, and conclusions on the underlying structure were drawn. This reveals that there is a tendency towards a broader definition and application of the term, a growing critical perspective, and a concentration on theory development and managerial implications. Research limitations/implications: The paper suggests that the locus of the innovation process and the extent of collaboration should be used as two dimensions in a model to further understanding of how open innovation develops. These dimensions have an important impact on both the human and the organizational side of innovation, areas that are highlighted as important fields for further research. Originality/value: Despite the interest in the open innovation topic, a comprehensive review of the academic publications in the area does not seem to exist. The review and the conclusions drawn support the understanding of the growing field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x · Cited by 1,410
Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x · Cited by 1,136 · cited 1×
“The ideas of open innovation originated from experiences from open source software (OSS) development where new principles for development projects were identified (e.g. Gruber and Henkel, 2006; West and Gallagher, 2006), and initially a lot of literature was based on technology transfer and spin out/spin in, but the s…”
A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets
Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M. W. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.011 · Cited by 470
Cited by
Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2015) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2014.11.002 · Cited by 503
ICT and sustainability in smart cities management
Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., Amitrano, C. C., & D'Auria, A. (2016) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-07-2015-0132 · Cited by 322
Naqshbandi, M. M., & Tabche, I. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.017 · Cited by 308
Antons, D., & Piller, F. T. (2015) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0091 · Cited by 289
Enabling Open Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach
Grimaldi, M., Quinto, I., & Rippa, P. (2013) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.1423 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Elmquist, M., Fredberg, T., & Ollila, S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-07-31
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-345
- ISSN
- 1460-1060 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054528481
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 51.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the field of open innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14601060910974219
- The paper
- Elmquist, M., Fredberg, T., & Ollila, S. (2009). Exploring the field of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060910974219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.