Cited by 322Smart Cities and TechnologiesE-Government and Public ServicesSustainable Urban and Rural Development

ICT and sustainability in smart cities management

Bifulco, Francesco, Tregua, Marco, Amitrano, Cristina Caterina, D'Auria, Anna·2016·International Journal of Public Sector Management

Abstract

Purpose: – Contemporary debate is increasingly focused on ICT and sustainability, especially in relation to the modern configuration of urban and metropolitan areas in the so-called smartization process. The purpose of this paper is to observe the connections between smart city features as conceptualized in the framework proposed by Giffinger et al. (2007) and new technologies as tools, and sustainability as the goal. Design/methodology/approach: – The connections are identified through a content analysis performed using NVivo on official reports issued by organizations, known as industry players within smart city projects, listed in the Navigant Research Report 2013. Findings: – The results frame ICT and sustainability as “across-the-board elements” because they connect with all of the services provided to communities in a smart city and play a key role in smart city planning. Specifically, sustainability and ICT can be seen as tools to enable the smartization process. Research limitations/implications: – An all-in-one perspective emerges by embedding sustainability and ICT in smart interventions; further research could be conduct through direct interviews to city managers and industry players in order to understand their attitude towards the development of smart city projects. Practical implications: – Potential approaches emerging from this research are useful to city managers or large corporations partnering with local agencies in order to increase the opportunities for the long-term success of smart projects. Originality/value: – The results of this paper delineate a new research path looking at the development of new models that integrate drivers, ICT, and sustainability in an all-in-one perspective and new indicators for the evaluation of the interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijpsm-07-2015-0132

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., Amitrano, C. C., & D'Auria, A.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Venue
International Journal of Public Sector Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-03-07
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
132-147
ISSN
0951-3558 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2301068687
Cited by
322
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 2
FWCI
33.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Public Sector Management (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • ARCHIVIO ISTITUZIONALE DELLA RICERCA-UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI "LORIENTALE" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
Keywords
smart cities, information and communication technologies, sustainability, smartization, urban management, smart city planning, industry players

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review