Cited by 202Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementService and Product InnovationSustainable Design and Development

Product design for product/service systems: Design experiences from Swedish industry

Open access
Sundin, Erik, Lindahl, Mattias, Ijomah, Winifred·2009·Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to elucidate how Swedish industry has adapted theirproducts for product/service systems (PSS).Design/methodology/approach – Three case study companies that manufacture forklift trucks,soil compactors and household appliances are studied. Interviews with company staff are conducted aswell as product analyses in laboratorial environment. The theory is based mainly on previous PSS,design and remanufacturing research.Findings – A key factor when developing products for PSS is to design the product from a life-cycleperspective, considering all the product’s life-cycle phases, namely manufacturing, use, maintenanceand end-of-life treatment. Many of the design improvements deal with the accessibility of parts andcomponents during maintenance and remanufacturing operations, and several of them could reducethe need and cost for maintenance, repair and remanufacturing.Research limitations/implications – Uncovering any additional product requirements needed fora successful PSS not addressed in this paper. For example, it could be interesting to explore whichproduct data could be collected during use in order to improve the products’ different life stages.Practical implications – The findings in this paper illustrate and describe many industrialimplications for engineering designers to consider when developing PSS.Originality/value – The novelty of this paper is aimed for designers to study how they can adapttheir future products used in PSS in a more beneficial way than in traditional product design. Thepaper shows ideas and general guidelines to follow which have been scarcely published.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17410380910961073

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Keeping buying new furniture with environmental criteria and limiting choices to a few models and designs would benefit future remanufacturing, since the critical design phase sets the possibilities for remanufacturing and disassembly.

    “This would benefit future remanufacturing, since the critical design phase sets the possibilities for remanufacturing and disassembly (Sundin et al., 2009;Cordella and Hidalgo, 2016;Öhgren et al., 2019;Bumgardner and Nicholls, 2020).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Sundin et al., 2009

    The Findings passage (page not given) says that life-cycle design and access to parts and components can reduce the need and cost of remanufacturing. It supports the general point that design affects future remanufacturing, but does not address disassembly or establish that limiting furniture purchases to a few models would provide that benefit. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To improve the possibility for remanufacturing, proactive choices must be taken in the design phase.

    “To improve the possibility for remanufacturing, proactive choices must be taken in the design phase (see, e.g., Sundin et al., 2009).”
  • If not managed, the shift in mindset needed can cause a major barrier to circular offerings.

    “If not managed, the shift in mindset needed can cause a major barrier to circular offerings (Sundin et al., 2009).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Sundin et al., 2009

    The available Findings passage describes life-cycle design requirements for product/service systems, but does not address a mindset shift becoming a barrier to circular offerings. Searches for “mindset,” “barrier,” and a shift from selling products to services returned no passage on that point. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies show that this mindset change is difficult to achieve.

    “Previous studies show that this mindset change is difficult to achieve (Sundin et al., 2009;Gomes et al., 2022).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Sundin et al., 2009

    The supplied passages describe adapting product design for product/service systems, but do not say that a mindset change is difficult to achieve. Searches for “mindset” and difficulty in moving from products to services found no passage addressing that point; the available passages have no section or page labels. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sundin, E., Lindahl, M., & Ijomah, W.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-06-05
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
723-753
ISSN
1741-038X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1546222186
Cited by
202
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
30.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
product-service systems, product design, remanufacturing, life cycle design, forklifts, household appliances, maintenance, end-of-life treatment, Swedish industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review