Cited by 201Quality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization TechniquesDigital Transformation in Industry

Lean manufacturing performance in Indian manufacturing plants

Ghosh, Manimay·2012·Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

Abstract

Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the current state of lean adoption in Indian manufacturing plants and its impact on operational performance. Design/methodology/approach – A survey questionnaire was developed and adapted based on work done in US industries. The survey questionnaire was sent to 400 firms in four geographic regions in India. In total, 79 usable responses were received for the study. Findings – Since lean manufacturing is a multi‐dimensional construct, the results demonstrate that approximately 80 percent of the respondents have implemented many dimensions of lean – focus on customer needs, pull system, setup time reduction, total productive maintenance, supplier performance, statistical process control, and cross‐departmental problem solving. The operational metrics have improved on all accounts: high productivity, reduced lead time, improved first‐pass correct output, reduced inventory and space requirement. Interestingly, respondents have indicated that first‐pass correct output, reduced manufacturing lead time, and increased productivity are the three main drivers of lean implementation. Research limitations/implications – Since the sample size is not very large, the results need to be considered with caution. Originality/value – Lean manufacturing is a very popular concept in the developed world and in some countries in the developing world as well. Yet, little is known about its current status in India, except for a few case studies. The study investigates the degree of lean production implementation in Indian manufacturing plants and its impact on operational metrics. The study also indicates the relationship between lean dimensions/practices and operational outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17410381311287517

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghosh, M.
Affiliations
Institute of Management Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Ghosh, Manimay
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2012-12-14
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
113-122
ISSN
1741-038X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996336753
Cited by
201
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
FWCI
19.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
lean manufacturing, lean adoption, operational performance, pull system, setup time reduction, total productive maintenance, supplier performance, statistical process control, production lead time, productivity, inventory reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review