Cited by 38Subtitles and Audiovisual MediaInnovations in Educational MethodsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Creating accessible educational multimedia through editing automatic speech recognition captioning in real time

Wald, Mike·2006·Interactive Technology and Smart Education

Abstract

Lectures can be digitally recorded and replayed to provide multimedia revision material for students who attended the class and a substitute learning experience for students unable to attend. Deaf and hard of hearing people can find it difficult to follow speech through hearing alone or to take notes while they are lip‐reading or watching a sign‐language interpreter. Notetakers can only summarise what is being said while qualified sign language interpreters with a good understanding of the relevant higher education subject content are in very scarce supply. Synchronising the speech with text captions can ensure deaf students are not disadvantaged and assist all learners to search for relevant specific parts of the multimedia recording by means of the synchronised text. Real time stenography transcription is not normally available in UK higher education because of the shortage of stenographers wishing to work in universities. Captions are time consuming and expensive to create by hand and while Automatic Speech Recognition can be used to provide real time captioning directly from lecturers’ speech in classrooms it has proved difficult to obtain accuracy comparable to stenography. This paper describes the development of a system that enables editors to correct errors in the captions as they are created by Automatic Speech Recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17415650680000058

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Speech can be up to ten times faster than typing, making manual transcription laborious.

    “Manually creating accurate transcripts for spoken language is a laborious task, as speech is up to ten times faster than typing [Wald 2006].”

    From Measuring the Accuracy of Automatic Speech Recognition Solutions (2023) · cites this paper as Wald 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wald, M.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Wald, Mike
Venue
Interactive Technology and Smart Education
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
131-141
ISSN
1741-5659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983009749
Cited by
38
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
22.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Interactive Technology and Smart Education (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
speech recognition, real-time captioning, deaf and hard of hearing students, accessible education, lecture recordings, stenography, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review