The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the ways in which governments build social media and information and communication technologies (ICTs) into e‐government transparency initiatives, to promote collaboration with members of the public and the ways in members of the public are able to employ the same social media to monitor government activities. Design/methodology/approach: This study used an iterative strategy that involved conducting a literature review, content analysis, and web site analysis, offering multiple perspectives on government transparency efforts, the role of ICTs and social media in these efforts, and the ability of e‐government initiatives to foster collaborative transparency through embedded ICTs and social media. Findings: The paper identifies key initiatives, potential impacts, and future challenges for collaborative e‐government as a means of transparency. Originality/value: The paper is one of the first to examine the interrelationships between ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government to facilitate transparency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Self-citation
Cited by
An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA)
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001 · Cited by 622
Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities
Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016 · Cited by 459
Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003 · Cited by 325
Big data and transformational government
Joseph, R. C., & Johnson, N. A. (2013) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2013.61 · Cited by 143
Public employees’ use of social media: Its impact on need satisfaction and intrinsic work motivation
Demircioglu, M. A., & Chen, C.-A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.008 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlo Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M.
- Venue
- Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-03-16
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-91
- ISSN
- 1750-6166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057703193
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 189.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17506161211214831
- The paper
- Carlo Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211214831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.