CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42Educational Theory and Curriculum StudiesEducational Curriculum and Learning MethodsEducation Pedagogy and Practices

How Curriculum Influences Student Learning

Stein, Mary Kay, Remillard, Janine, Smith, Margaret S.·2007·Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning
DOI 10.1108/978-1-28141-200-320251012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/978-1-28141-200-320251012

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 97

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1990, Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy
  3. Balfanz, 2006, The implementation and impact of evidence-based mathematics reforms in high-poverty middle schools: A multi-site, multiyear study, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 33
  4. Begle, 1970, Mathematics education: The sixty-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education
  5. Ben-Peretz, 1990, The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts
  6. Berends, 2001, Implementation and Performance in New American Schools: Three Years into Scale-Up
  7. Berman, 1973, Implementing innovations: Revisions for an agenda for a study of change agent programs in education. Study of change agent programs: A working note
  8. Berman, 1978, Federal
  9. Boaler, 1997, Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex, and setting
  10. Boaler, 2004, The importance of depth and breadth in the analysis of teaching: A framework for analyzing teacher questions
  11. Bodilly, 1998, Lessons from new American schools’ scale-up phase: Prospects for bringing designs to multiple schools
  12. Borasi, 1990, Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s, 174
  13. Brown, 2002, Teaching by design: Understanding the interactions between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovation
  14. Brown, Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher-tool relationship
  15. Brown, 1996, Innovations in learning: New environments for education, 289
  16. Carpenter, 1988, Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics, 2
  17. Carpenter, 1999, Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding, 19
  18. Chappell, 2003, Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn?, 285
  19. Chazan, 1999, Beyond being told not to tell, For the Learning of Mathematics, 12, 2
  20. Chavez, 2003, From the textbook to the enacted curriculum: Textbook use in the middle school mathematics classroom
  21. Cohen, 1993, Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice, 207
  22. Cohen, 1990, Effects of state-level reform of elementary school mathematics curriculum on classroom practice
  23. Datnow, 2002, Extending educational reform: From one school to many
  24. Davenport, 2000, Elementary mathematics curricula as a tool for mathematics education reform: Challenges of implementation and implications for professional development
  25. Donovan, 1983, Power and curriculum in implementation: A case study of an innoivative mathematics program
  26. Doyle, 1992, Handbook of research on curriculum, 486
  27. EEPA, 1990, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 233
  28. Fennema, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 147
  29. Fey, 1979, Mathematics teaching today: Perspectives from three national surveys, The Arithmetic Teacher, 27, 10
  30. Franke, 2001, Beyond classical pedagogy in teaching elementary mathematics: The nature of facilitative teaching, 47
  31. Frykholm, 2004, Teachers’ tolerance for discomfort: Implications for curricular reform in mathematics, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 19, 125
  32. Fullan, 1991, The new meaning of educational change
  33. Gagne, 1977, The conditions of learning
  34. Gehrke, 1992, In search of the school curriculum, Review of Research in Education, 18, 51
  35. Grouws, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning
  36. Grouws, 2004, The 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Results and interpretations, 221
  37. Herbel-Eisenmann, Reconsidering the study of mathematics instructional practices: The importance of curricular context in understanding local and global teacher change
  38. Hiebert, 1997, Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding
  39. Jackson, 1968, Life in classrooms
  40. Jackson, 1992, Handbook of research on curriculum, 3
  41. Jennings, 1996, Interpreting policy in real classrooms: Case studies of state reform and teacher practice
  42. Kilpatrick, 2003, Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn?, 471
  43. Kirby, 2004, Comparison of I CAN LEARN and traditionally- taught 8th grade student performance on the Georgia Criterion- Referenced Competency Test
  44. Kirby, 2001, Implementation in a longitudinal sample of new American schools: Four years into scale-up
  45. Klein, 2000, Math problems: Why the U.S. Department of Education’s recommended math programs don’t add up, 52
  46. Kulm, 1999, Evaluating mathematics textbooks, Basic Education, 43
  47. Little, 1993, Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts
  48. Love, 1996, International handbook of mathematics, 371
  49. Mailloux, 1982, Interpretive conventions: The reader in the study of American fiction
  50. Mokros, 2003, Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn?
  51. Morgan, 2002, An experimental study of the effects of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I on student knowledge and attitude
  52. Mosteller, 2002, Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research
  53. National Center for Education Statistics, 2003, Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Result form the TIMSS video study
  54. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989, Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics
  55. National Council ofTeachers of Mathematics, 1991, Professional standards for teaching mathematics
  56. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
  57. National Research Council, 1989, Everybody counts
  58. National Research Council, 2001, Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics
  59. National Research Council, 2002, Scientific research in education
  60. National Research Council, 2004, On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations
  61. National Research Council, 2004, On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations
  62. National Science Foundation, 1989, Materials for mathematics instruction: Program solicitation
  63. 2002, No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
  64. Putnam, 2003, Standards- based school mathematics curricula: What are they ? What do students learn?, 161
  65. Rodriguez, 2000, An investigation into how a teacher uses a reform-oriented mathematics curriculum
  66. Romagnano, 1994, Wrestling with change: The dilemmas of teaching real mathematics
  67. Romberg, 1997, Mathematics teachers in transition, 357
  68. Romberg, 1992, Handbook of research on curriculum, 749
  69. Sarason, 1982, The culture of the school and the problem of change
  70. Schmidt, 1997, Splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. mathematics and science education
  71. Schoen, 1999, Issues and options in the math wars, 444
  72. Senk, 2003, Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn?
  73. Sherin, 2004, Identifying patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum
  74. Smith, 2000, Balancing old and new: An experienced middle school teacher’s learning in the context of mathematics instructional reform, Elementary SchoolJournal, 100, 351
  75. Smith, 2001, Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics
  76. Stake, 1978, Case studies in science education
  77. Stein, 2005, Districts’ use of instructional guidance systems
  78. Stein, The role of mathematics curriculum in large-scale reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning
  79. Stein, 2006, The enactment of reform mathematics curricula in urban settings: A comparative analysis
  80. Stein, 1996, Classrooms in which students successfully acquire mathematical proficiency: What are the critical features of teachers’ instructional practice
  81. Stein, 1998, Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning, 17
  82. Stein, 2000, Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development
  83. Stein, 2003, Infusing mathematics reform into a literacy saturated environment: A challenge of content-driven systemic reform
  84. Stephens, 1982, Mathematical knowledge and school work: A case study of the teaching of developing mathematical processes
  85. Stigler, 2004, Improving mathematics teaching, Educational Leadership, 61, 12
  86. Stodolsky, 1989, From Socrates to software: The teacher as text and the text as teacher, 159
  87. Suydam, 1977, The status of pre-college science, mathematics, and social studies education: 1955-1975
  88. Swafford, 2003, Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they ? What do students learn, 457
  89. Tarr, The impact of middle grades mathematics curricula on student achievement and the classroom learning environment
  90. Thompson, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 127
  91. Valverde, 2002, Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks
  92. Viadero, 2004, Researchers question Clearinghouse choices, 30
  93. Walker, 1976, Curriculum evolution as portrayed through old textbooks
  94. Weiss, 1978, Report of the 1977 National Survey of Science, Mathematics, and Social Studies Education
  95. Weiss, 2004, What is high-quality instruction?, Educational Leadership, 61, 24
  96. Wilson, 2000, The challenge to share mathematical authority with students: High school teachers’ experiences reforming classroom roles and activities through curriculum implementation, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15, 146
  97. Wittrock, 1986, Handbook of research on teaching, 297

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
ORCID
Venue
Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Publisher
Emerald Publishing Limited
Published
2007-06-15
Pages
319-369
DOI
10.1108/978-1-28141-200-320251012
OpenAlex
W4417128361
Cited by
42
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
course program, student learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review