The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A study on perception of teachers and students toward online classes in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi District
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The study aims at analyzing the perception of teachers and students about online classes. The work tries to explain the opinions of students as regards the impact of online courses, their comfortability in its usag, and the support received from teachers in online classes along with teachers' opinions on efficacy, teaching practice followed and training received for an online class. Design/methodology/approach: The analysis was carried out using the data collected through two separate structured questionnaires for students and teachers in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi District in Karnataka. Data were recorded in SPSS and analyzed by using descriptive statistics. Findings: The study reveals that students are comfortable with online classes and are getting enough support from teachers but they do not believe that online classes will replace traditional classroom teaching. It also finds that teachers are facing difficulties in conducting online classes due to a lack of proper training and development for doing online classes. Technical issues are the major problem for the effectiveness of the online classes. Practical implications: Most of the colleges think of implementing online classes in their courses. Hence, it becomes essential to obtain the opinions of participants of online classes before applying for it. This study may help colleges to get a general view of online classes among teachers and students. Originality/value: Internet and new technologies gained importance in all fields including the education sector which gave scope for online classes. In addition to this, the COVID pandemic worldwide has also added to the relevance of online classes. In this light, it is necessary to understand student–teacher perceptions regarding online classes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chapter 12 Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence
Levine, R. (2005) · Handbook of Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01012-9 · Cited by 2,889
The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811311500307 · Cited by 1,638
Bejerano, A. R. (2008) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520801993697 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Faculty’s and Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19
Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.638470 · Cited by 543
Buric, M., Novovic Buric, M., Jaksic Stojanovic, A., Kascelan, L., & Zugić, D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142113717 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Kulal, A., & Nayak, A.
- Venue
- Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-10-29
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-296
- ISSN
- 1858-3431 (ISSN-L)
- 2414-6994
- OpenAlex
- W3096076832
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 56.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study on perception of teachers and students toward online classes in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi District. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/aaouj-07-2020-0047
- The paper
- Kulal, A., & Nayak, A. (2020). A study on perception of teachers and students toward online classes in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi District. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-07-2020-0047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.