The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Faculty’s and Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted teaching in a vriety of institutions. It has tested the readiness of academic institutions to deal with such abrupt crisis. Online learning has become the main method of instruction during the pandemic in Jordan. After 4 months of online education, two online surveys were distributed to investigate faculty’s and Students’ perception of the learning process that took place over that period of time with no face to face education. In this regard, the study aimed to identify both faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning, utilizing two surveys one distributed to 50 faculty members and another 280 students were selected randomly to explore the effectiveness, challenges, and advantages of online education in Jordan. The analysis showed that the common online platforms in Jordan were Zoom, Microsoft Teams offering online interactive classes, and WhatsApp in communication with students outside the class. The study found that both faculty and students agreed that online education is useful during the current pandemic. At the same time, its efficacy is less effective than face-to-face learning and teaching. Faculty and students indicated that online learning challenges lie in adapting to online education, especially for deaf and hard of hearing students, lack of interaction and motivation, technical and Internet issues, data privacy, and security. They also agreed on the advantages of online learning. The benefits were mainly self-learning, low costs, convenience, and flexibility. Even though online learning works as a temporary alternative due to COVID-19, it could not substitute face-to-face learning. The study recommends that blended learning would help in providing a rigorous learning environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis
Dhawan, S. (2020) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239520934018 · Cited by 5,083
Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 · Cited by 2,729
Al-Balas, M., Al-Balas, H. I., Jaber, H. M., Obeidat, K., Al-Balas, H., Aborajooh, E. A., Al-Taher, R., & Al-Balas, B. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02257-4 · Cited by 706
Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2021) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z · Cited by 592
The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics
Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.005 · Cited by 435
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300 · Cited by 423
Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12243 · Cited by 274
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2016) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.2741 · Cited by 245
Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction
Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004) · Cited by 244
Kulal, A., & Nayak, A. (2020) · Asian Association of Open Universities Journal · doi:10.1108/aaouj-07-2020-0047 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Communication Apprehension and Psychological Well-Being of Students in Online Learning
Agrawal, S., & Krishna, S. M. (2021) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs11110145 · Cited by 41
Malik, L., Shahnawaz, M. G., Rehman, U., Pragyendu, Uniyal, R., & Griffiths, M. D. (2023) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-023-00323-4 · Cited by 37
Culture of integrity – institutional response to integrity during COVID19
Khan, Z. R., Priya, J., & Tuffnell, C. (2022) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-022-00118-9 · Cited by 12
Pérez, M. A., Tiemann, P., & Urrejola-Contreras, G. P. (2023) · Educación Médica · doi:10.1016/j.edumed.2023.100801 · Cited by 10
“In the other hand, studies by Almahasees and collaborators (14), establish that faculty preferred traditional teaching, in-person, rather than online classes, because in-person instruction allows to applied active learning strategy with immediate feedback to discuss and have lively guidance for your students J ur na l…”
BackgroundBuric, M., Novovic Buric, M., Jaksic Stojanovic, A., Kascelan, L., & Zugić, D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142113717 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Education
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-05-12
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2504-284X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3160894093
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 204.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Faculty’s and Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470
- The paper
- Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021). Faculty’s and Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.