The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Italian consumers’ income and food waste behavior
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to provide insights on the relationships between consumers’ income and household food waste behaviors. Design/methodology/approach: – Attitude toward food waste is a paradigmatic (economic) non-standard decision making. Based on behavioral economics concepts and empirical evidences, the study analyzes the frequency of household food waste and its main drivers with a focus on individual income. Through a panel of 1,403 Italian consumers, food waste behavior and its determinants are modeled for five food typologies using proportional odds models that adopt stepwise procedures and genetic algorithms. Findings: – Results suggest the existence of complex relationships between per capita income and household food waste behavior. When considering food typologies that include high value added products, this relation can be explained by an inverse U-shaped curve: mid-to-low income consumers purchase higher amounts of lower quality products and waste more food. Research limitations/implications: – The research highlights the importance of understanding the main socio-economic and behavioral determinants of household food waste, and the need for further researches. Practical implications: – The research motivates specific pricing, commercial and policy strategies as well as organizational technological, and educational solutions to prevent/reduce household food waste. Social implications: – Lower income class consumers show a greater attitude to waste certain food typologies. In turn, this implies that food waste can further worse economic inequality and relative poverty. Originality/value: – The study identifies different patterns of relationship among individual income and consumers’ food waste behavior, and describes the conditions that limit a household “Food Waste Kuznets Curve.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Setti et al. (2016) show a high degree of ethical concern related to food waste (86%).”
From Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications (2018) · cites this paper as Setti et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In turn, households that spend more money on groceries per person tend to produce more food waste per person (Parizeau et al., 2015;Setti et al., 2016).”
From Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications (2018) · cites this paper as Setti et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Setti et al. (2016) reveal that consumers who buy local products on a regular basis tend to significantly limit (up to 90%) the frequency of wasting vegetables.”
From Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications (2018) · cites this paper as Setti et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“as well as with regards to which type of food is wasted (Setti et al., 2016).”
From Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications (2018) · cites this paper as Setti et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,178
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,340
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 18,636
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Regression Models for Ordinal Data
McCullagh, P. (1980) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x · Cited by 4,453
Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey
Dinda, S. (2004) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011 · Cited by 4,106
The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve
Stern, D. I. (2004) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004 · Cited by 4,013
(2011) · FAO eBooks · Cited by 3,368
Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0126 · Cited by 3,197
Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field
DellaVigna, S. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.315 · Cited by 2,412
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Møller, H. , Hanssen, O.J. , Gustavsson, J. , Östergren, K. , Stenmarck, A. and Dekhtyar, P. (2014), “Report on review of (food) waste reporting methodology and practice”, FUSIONS project, Wageningen.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schanes, K., Dobernig, K., & Gözet, B. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030 · Cited by 1,365
The household wasteful behaviour framework: A systematic review of consumer food waste
Principato, L., Mattia, G., Di Leo, A., & Pratesi, C. A. (2021) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.010 · Cited by 290
Drivers and barriers to food waste reduction
Stangherlin, I. D. C., & de Barcellos, M. D. (2018) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-12-2017-0726 · Cited by 231
Principato, L., Secondi, L., Cicatiello, C., & Mattia, G. (2020) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.seps.2020.100953 · Cited by 207
Food wasters: Profiling consumers’ attitude to waste food in Italy
Gaiani, S., Caldeira, S., Adorno, V., Segrè, A., & Vittuari, M. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.012 · Cited by 209
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Setti, M., Falasconi, L., Segrè, A., Cusano, I., & Vittuari, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Venue
- British Food Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-07-04
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1731-1746
- ISSN
- 0007-070X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2474325137
- Semantic Scholar
- ab5db3c3d4d9315af63d9dcd97129e7a6cd14d07
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 16.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- household food waste, consumer income, food waste behavior, Kuznets curve, socio-economic determinants, food quality, food waste reduction, relative poverty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review