Cited by 4,106Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthSustainable Development and Environmental PolicySustainable Development and Environmental Management

Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey

Dinda, Soumyananda·2004·Ecological Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinda, S.
Affiliations
Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Dinda, Soumyananda
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
431-455
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987019268
Cited by
4,106
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 417 · 2025: 386 · 2024: 350 · 2023: 369 · 2022: 316 · 2021: 308 · 2020: 347 · 2019: 238 · 2018: 194 · 2017: 189 · 2016: 174 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 133 · 2013: 116 · 2012: 78
FWCI
52.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
Keywords
environmental Kuznets curve, environmental quality, economic growth, income and pollution, environmental degradation, air quality, income thresholds, economic development stages, environmental policy, methodological critique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review