The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for talent acquisition in IT/ITeS organizations
Abstract
Purpose: Human resource managers are adopting AI technology for conducting various tasks of human resource management, starting from manpower planning till employee exit. AI technology is prominently used for talent acquisition in organizations. This research investigates the adoption of AI technology for talent acquisition. Design/methodology/approach: This study employs Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) and Task-Technology-Fit (TTF) framework and proposes a model to explore the adoption of AI technology for talent acquisition. The survey was conducted among the 562 human resource managers and talent acquisition managers with a structured questionnaire. The analysis of data was completed using PLS-SEM. Findings: This research reveals that cost-effectiveness, relative advantage, top management support, HR readiness, competitive pressure and support from AI vendors positively affect AI technology adoption for talent acquisition. Security and privacy issues negatively influence the adoption of AI technology. It is found that task and technology characteristics influence the task technology fit of AI technology for talent acquisition. Adoption and task technology fit of AI technology influence the actual usage of AI technology for talent acquisition. It is revealed that stickiness to traditional talent acquisition methods negatively moderates the association between adoption and actual usage of AI technology for talent acquisition. The proposed model was empirically validated and revealed the predictors of adoption and actual usage of AI technology for talent acquisition. Practical implications: This paper provides the predictors of the adoption of AI technology for talent acquisition, which is emerging extensively in the human resource domain. It provides vital insights to the human resource managers to benchmark AI technology required for talent acquisition. Marketers can develop their marketing plan considering the factors of adoption. It would help designers to understand the factors of adoption and design the AI technology algorithms and applications for talent acquisition. It contributes to advance the literature of technology adoption by interweaving it with the human resource domain literature on talent acquisition. Originality/value: This research uniquely validates the model for the adoption of AI technology for talent acquisition using the TOE and TTF framework. It reveals the factors influencing the adoption and actual usage of AI technology for talent acquisition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a result, how people perceive AI is determined by how it works, how much it costs, and what features it includes (Pillai and Sivathanu, 2020).”
From Exploring the antecedents of AI adoption for effective HRM practices in the Indian pharmaceutical sector (2023) · cites this paper as Pillai and Sivathanu, 2020
In the citing paper
“Recruiters can now delegate these mundane tasks to AI systems, freeing up their time and resources for more strategic issues (Pillai and Sivathanu, 2020).”
From Exploring the antecedents of AI adoption for effective HRM practices in the Indian pharmaceutical sector (2023) · cites this paper as Pillai and Sivathanu, 2020
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research
F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128 · Cited by 11,728
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Behavior
- 2012, Conceptual model for examining knowledge management system (KMS) adoption in public sector organizations in Saudi Arabia, Gov Workshop, 2, 1
- 2001, Social cognitive theory of mass communication media psychology, Psychology, 3, 265
- 2017, Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation, 1
- 2018, Insight - Amazon Scraps Secret AI Recruiting Tool that Showed Bias against Women
- 1990, The context for change: organization, technology and environment. The processes of technological innovation, The Processes of Technological Innovation, 199, 151
- 2017, Biometrics won't solve our data-security crisis, Harvard Business Review
- 2016, Impact of technology on recruitment process and its impact on service quality of HR service provider, BIMS Journal of Management, 3, 26
- 2000, Web portals usher in, drive away business, National Underwriter/Property and Casualty Risk and Benefits, 104, 19
- 1955, A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence
- 2001, The War for Talent
- 1978, Psychometric Theory
- 2011, Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level
- 2017, A Multidimensional Framework for Human Resource Information Systems Adoption and Use in a South African University
- 2016, E-recruitment–an organizational change. International, Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 3, 78
- 2017, Factors influencing E-HRM implementation in government organisations, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31, 247
- 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
- 1983, Diffusion of. Innovations. Glencoe
- 2006, Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants
- 2007, Research in E-HRM: Review and Implications, 19
- 2009, Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study, 99
- 1991, An integrated model of information system Adoption in small business, Journal of Managemnet Inforamtion System, 15, 187
- 1990, The Process of Technology Innovation
- 2005, Adoption of Electronic Government Services Among Business Organizations in Singapore, 417
- 2013, Computers in Human Behavior Why Aren' T Organizations Adopting Virtual Worlds?, 772
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927
Gama, F., & Magistretti, S. (2025) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12698 · Cited by 388
Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M., & Cherubini, E. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375 · Cited by 316
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279
Bag, S., Srivastava, G., Bashir, M. A., Kumari, S., Giannakis, M., & Chowdhury, A. H. (2021) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-07-2021-0415 · Cited by 286
“engage customers via social media websites (Pillai and Sivathanu, 2020).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B.
- Affiliations
- Sri Balaji University, Pune (IN)
- Venue
- Benchmarking: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-08-14
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2599-2629
- ISSN
- 1463-5771 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3049223401
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 146
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 22
- FWCI
- 36.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Benchmarking An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence adoption, talent acquisition, technology adoption, task-technology fit, technology-organization-environment framework, cost-effectiveness, relative advantage, top management support, competitive pressure, privacy and security concerns, human resource management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review