The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to integrate leadership into the job demands-resources (JD-R) model. Based on self-determination theory, it was argued that engaging leaders who inspire, strengthen, and connect their followers would reduce employee’s levels of burnout and increase their levels of work engagement. Design/methodology/approach: – An online survey was conducted among a representative sample of the Dutch workforce (n=1,213) and the research model was tested using structural equation modeling. Findings: – It appeared that leadership only had an indirect effect on burnout and engagement – via job demands and job resources – but not a direct effect. Moreover, leadership also had a direct relationship with organizational outcomes such as employability, performance, and commitment. Research limitations/implications: – The study used a cross-sectional design and all variables were based on self-reports. Hence, results should be replicated in a longitudinal study and using more objective measures (e.g. for work performance). Practical implications: – Since engaged leaders, who inspire, strengthen, and connect their followers, provide a work context in which employees thrive, organizations are well advised to promote engaging leadership. Social implications: – Leadership seems to be a crucial factor which has an indirect impact – via job demands and job resources – on employee well-being. Originality/value: – The study demonstrates that engaging leadership can be integrated into the JD-R framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
Self-citationThe Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733115 · Cited by 12,996
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.248 · Cited by 9,297
Self-citationDevelopment and validation of the job crafting scale
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009 · Cited by 2,060
Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601111401017 · Cited by 1,315 · cited 1×
“Moreover, engaging leaders also strengthen their followers meaning that they foster performance and performance behaviors such as self-development, proactivity, and goal directedness (see the meta-analyses of Wang et al. , 2011, for similar effects of transformational leadership).”
Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement
Breevaart, K., Bakker, A., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2014) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12041 · Cited by 668
Veldhoven, M. V., Jonge, J. D., Broersen, S., Kompier, M., & Meijman, T. (2002) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370210166399 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Salvagioni, D. A. J., Melanda, F. N., Mesas, A. E., González, A. D., Gabani, F. L., & Andrade, S. M. D. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185781 · Cited by 1,508
Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model
Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941211051988 · Cited by 912
Self-citationBorst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., & Lako, C. J. (2019) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x17729870 · Cited by 245
The job demands-resources model as a theoretical lens for the bright and dark side of digitization
Scholze, A., & Hecker, A. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108177 · Cited by 200
Bregenzer, A., & Jimenez, P. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24906 · Cited by 73
Servant leadership and work-related well-being in a construction company
Coetzer, M. F., Bussin, M. H. R., & Geldenhuys, M. (2017) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v43i0.1478 · Cited by 69
Bauwens, R., Denissen, M., Van Beurden, J., & Coun, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702648 · Cited by 45
Ali, Z., & Mehreen, A. (2019) · Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship · doi:10.1108/ebhrm-11-2018-0069 · Cited by 19
Schubin, K., Seinsche, L., Pfaff, H., & Zeike, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.994959 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaufeli, W. B.
- Venue
- Career Development International
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-09-14
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 446-463
- ISSN
- 1362-0436 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6003
- OpenAlex
- W1844365549
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 30.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
