Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,545

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I – method

Open access
Hair, Jr., Joe F., Sarstedt, Marko, Matthews, Lucy M, Ringle, Christian M·2016·European Business Review
DOI 10.1108/ebr-09-2015-0094
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of unobserved heterogeneity in the context of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), its prevalence and challenges for social science researchers. Part II – in the next issue (European Business Review, Vol. 28 No. 2) – presents a case study, which illustrates how to identify and treat unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM using the finite mixture PLS (FIMIX-PLS) module in the SmartPLS 3 software. Design/methodology/approach: – The paper merges literatures from various disciplines, such as management information systems, marketing and statistics, to present a state-of-the-art review of FIMIX-PLS. Based on this review, the paper offers guidelines on how to apply the technique to specific research problems. Findings: – FIMIX-PLS offers a means to identify and treat unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM and is particularly useful for determining the number of segments to extract from the data. In the latter respect, prior applications of FIMIX-PLS restricted their focus to a very limited set of criteria, but future studies should broaden the scope by considering information criteria, theory and logic. Research limitations/implications: – Since the introduction of FIMIX-PLS, a range of alternative latent class techniques have emerged to address some of the limitations of the approach relating, for example, to the technique’s inability to handle heterogeneity in the measurement models and its distributional assumptions. The second part of this article (Part II) discusses alternative latent class techniques in greater detail and calls for the joint use of FIMIX-PLS and PLS prediction-oriented segmentation. Originality/value: – This paper is the first to offer researchers who have not been exposed to the method an introduction to FIMIX-PLS. Based on a state-of-the-art review of the technique in Part I, Part II follows up by offering a step-by-step tutorial on how to use FIMIX-PLS in SmartPLS 3.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ebr-09-2015-0094

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Akaike, H. (1973), “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle”, in Petrov, B.N. and Csáki, F. (Eds), Second International Symposium on Information Theory , Académiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 267-281.
  2. Becker, J.-M. , Rai, A. , Ringle, C.M. and Völckner, F. (2013), “Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats”, MIS Quarterly , Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 665-694. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Becker, J.-M. , Ringle, C.M. , Sarstedt, M. and Völckner, F. (2015), “How collinearity affects mixture regression results”, Marketing Letters , Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 643-659. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bozdogan, H. (1994), “Mixture-model cluster analysis using model selection criteria in a new information measure of complexity”, in Bozdogan, H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the First US/Japan Conference on Frontiers of Statistical Modelling: An Information Approach , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp. 69-113.
  5. Chin, W.W. and Dibbern, J. (2010), “A permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA”, in Esposito Vinzi, V. , Chin, W.W. , Henseler, J. and Wang, H. (Eds), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series), Vol. 2, Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York, NY, pp. 171-193. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dibbern, J. and Chin, W.W. (2005), “Multi-group comparison: testing a PLS model on the sourcing of application software services across Germany and the USA using a permutation based algorithm”, in Bliemel, F.W. , Eggert, A. , Fassott, G. and Henseler, J. (Eds), Handbuch PLS-Pfadmodellierung, Methode, Anwendung, Praxisbeispiele , Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp. 135-160.
  7. Hahn, C. , Johnson, M.D. , Herrmann, A. and Huber, F. (2002), “Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach”, Schmalenbach Business Review , Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 243-269. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hair, J.F. , Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011), “PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet”, The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice , Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 139-152. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hair, J.F. , Sarstedt, M. , Pieper, T.M. and Ringle, C.M. (2012a), “The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 45 Nos 5/6, pp. 320-340. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hair, J.F. , Hult, G.T.M. , Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2016), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM ), 2nd edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  11. Hair, J.F. , Sarstedt, M. , Hopkins, L. and Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014b), “Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research”, European Business Review , Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 106-121. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Henseler, J. , Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2016), “Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares”, International Marketing Review , in Press. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Jedidi, K. , Jagpal, H.S. and DeSarbo, W.S. (1997), “Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity”, Marketing Science , Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 39-59. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kaufmann, L. and Gaeckler, J. (2015), “A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 259-272. · DOI
  15. Kessel, F. , Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2010), “On the impact of missing values on model selection in FIMIX-PLS”, Proceedings of the 2010 INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Cologne.
  16. Lee, L. , Petter, S. , Fayard, D. and Robinson, S. (2011), “On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems , Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 305-328. · DOI
  17. Liang, Z. , Jaszak, R.J. and Coleman, R.E. (1992), “Parameter estimation of finite mixtures using the EM algorithm and information criteria with applications to medical image processing”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science , Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 1126-1133. · DOI
  18. Matthews, L. , Sarstedt, M. , Hair, J.F. and Ringle, C.M. (2016), “Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part II – a case study”, European Business Review , Vol. 28 No. 2. · DOI
  19. Money, K.G. , Hillenbrand, C. , Henseler, J. and Da Camara, N. (2012), “Exploring unanticipated consequences of strategy amongst stakeholder segments: the case of a European revenue service”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 45 Nos 5/6, pp. 395-423. · DOI
  20. Ramaswamy, V. , DeSarbo, W.S. , Reibstein, D.J. and Robinson, W.T. (1993), “An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data”, Marketing Science , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 103-124. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Rapp, A. , Trainor, K.J. and Agnihotri, R. (2010), “Performance implications of customer-linking capabilities: examining the complementary role of customer orientation and CRM technology”, Journal of Business Research , Vol. 63 No. 11, pp. 1229-1236. · DOI
  22. Rigdon, E.E. , Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2010), “Structural modeling of heterogeneous data with partial least squares”, in Malhotra, N.K. (Ed.), Review of Marketing Research , Sharpe, Armonk, NY, pp. 255-296. · doi:10.1108/s1548-6435(2010)0000007011 · Paper page
  23. Rigdon, E.E. , Ringle, C.M. , Sarstedt, M. and Gudergan, S.P. (2011), “Assessing heterogeneity in customer satisfaction studies: across industry similarities and within industry differences”, Advances in International Marketing , Vol. 22, pp. 169-194. · doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2011)0000022011
  24. Ringle, C.M. , Sarstedt, M. and Mooi, E.A. (2010a), “Response-based segmentation using finite mixture partial least squares: theoretical foundations and an application to American customer satisfaction index data”, Annals of Information Systems , Vol. 8, pp. 19-49. · DOI
  25. Ringle, C.M. , Wende, S. and Will, A. (2005a), “Customer segmentation with FIMIX-PLS”, in Aluja, T. , Casanovas, J. , Esposito Vinzi, V. , Morineau, A. and Tenenhaus, M. (Eds), PLS and Related Methods: Proceedings of the PLS’05 International Symposium . Decisia, Paris, pp. 507-514.
  26. Ringle, C.M. , Wende, S. and Will, A. (2010b), “Finite mixture partial least squares analysis: methodology and numerical examples”, in Esposito Vinzi, V. , Chin, W.W. , Henseler, J. and Wang, H. (Eds), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, Vol. 2), Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, NY, pp. 195-218. · DOI
  27. Sarstedt, M. (2008a), “Market segmentation with mixture regression models”, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing , Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 228-246. · DOI
  28. Sarstedt, M. (2008b), “A review of recent approaches for capturing heterogeneity in partial least squares path modelling”, Journal of Modelling in Management , Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 140-161. · DOI
  29. Sarstedt, M. , Becker, J.-M. , Ringle, C.M. and Schwaiger, M. (2011a), “Uncovering and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: which model selection criterion provides an appropriate number of segments?”, Schmalenbach Business Review , Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 34-62. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Sarstedt, M. and Mooi, E.A. (2014), A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics , Springer, Berlin. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Sarstedt, M. , Ringle, C.M. and Gudergan, S.P. (2016), “Guidelines for treating unobserved heterogeneity in tourism research: a comment on Marques and Reis (2015)”, Annals of Tourism Research , in press. · DOI
  32. Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C.M. (2010), “Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modelling: a comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies”, Journal of Applied Statistics , Vol. 37 No. 8, pp. 1299-1318. · DOI
  33. Sarstedt, M. , Ringle, C.M. , Smith, D. , Reams, R. and Hair, J.F. (2014), “Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers”, Journal of Family Business Strategy , Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 105-115. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Sarstedt, M. , Schwaiger, M. and Ringle, C.M. (2009), “Do we fully understand the critical success factors of customer satisfaction with industrial goods? - Extending Festge and Schwaiger’s model to account for unobserved heterogeneity”, Journal of Business Market Management , Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 185-206. · DOI
  35. Schwarz, G. (1978), “Estimating the dimensions of a model”, Annals of Statistics , Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 461-464. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Steinley, D. (2003), “Local optima in K-means clustering: what you don’t know may hurt you”, Psychological Methods , Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 294-304. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Wedel, M. and Kamakura, W.A. (2000), Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , Kluwer, Boston, MA. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Wilden, R. and Gudergan, S. (2015), “The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 181-199. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hair, Jr., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M.
Venue
European Business Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-01-11
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
63-76
ISSN
0955-534X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/ebr-09-2015-0094
OpenAlex
W2206114644
Cited by
1,545
References
7
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.