Cited by 36AI and HR TechnologiesImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyArtificial Intelligence Applications

Unrealistic Optimism Regarding Artificial Intelligence Opportunities in Human Resource Management

Open access
Weber, Patrick·2023·International Journal of Knowledge Management

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has many uses in domains like automotive and finance or business divisions like human resource management (HRM). This study presents a survey that was conducted among a German national sample (n = 79) of HRM personnel from small- and medium-sized enterprises regarding the expected impact of AI on their own and other companies. Indications for unrealistic optimism, i.e., assuming negative impacts are more likely for others than oneself, were identified. AI will play an increasingly important role, with cost reductions and efficiency gains serving as the highest motives and a lack of AI specialists representing the highest inhibitor. Participants assume that AI will reduce the number of employees in other companies, while it let the one in their own grow. They expect AI to take over more tasks in other companies and believe AI will more impact other companies' HRM, especially in administrative processing. Future research should include (repeated) investigations into other business divisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/ijkm.317217

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many researchers have called for the development of AI-literacy-assessment instruments of high psychometric quality.

    “For this reason, many researchers have called for the development of AI-literacy-assessment instruments of high psychometric quality [15,17,18].”

    From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

    In Limitations and Future Research (page unavailable), Weber suggests that future studies explicitly measure AI literacy using an objective scale. That supports the need to assess AI literacy, but the paper does not call for developing a new instrument of high psychometric quality or establish that many researchers have made that call. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Daugherty, P. R., Wilson, H. J., & Michelman, P. (2019). Revisiting the jobs artificial intelligence will create. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 0_1-0_8.
  2. Milne, L. (1995). Feature selection using neural networks with contribution measures. Eighth Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AI'95.
  3. Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. (2020). Fundamentals of human resource management (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  4. Schwertfeger, B. (2015). Personalauswahl per Sprachtest. Personalmagazin, 17(12), 32-34.
  5. Sen, A., Das, A., Ghosh, K., & Ghosh, S. (2012). Screener: A system for extracting education related information from resumes using text based information extraction system. International Conference on Computer and Software Modeling, (vol. 54, pp. 31-35). ACM.
  6. Patrick Weber has been working as a research assistant at Goethe University Frankfurt at the Chair of Information Systems and Information Management of Prof. Dr. Oliver Hinz since February 2020. Patrick Weber served as a reviewer for the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS, AI in Business and Society Track) as well as the Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI, Digital Markets & Platforms Track). His core areas include research on information asymmetries, explainable artificial intelligence, and disclosure in influencer marketing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber, P.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Weber, Patrick
Venue
International Journal of Knowledge Management
Published
2023-01-27
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 1548-0658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-0666
OpenAlex
W4318307490
Cited by
31
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
ng
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Knowledge Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence, human resource management, optimism bias, small and medium-sized enterprises, cost reduction, efficiency improvement, job displacement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review