Cited by 26Employment and Welfare StudiesJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Health and Well-being

Outcomes of job insecurity among hotel employees during COVID-19

Open access
Karatepe, Osman M., Okumus, Fevzi, Saydam, Mehmet Bahri·2024·International Hospitality Review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper investigates the consequences of job insecurity among hotel employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach: Data were obtained from the employees of two five-star chain hotels in Turkey. The study hypotheses were tested via structural equation modeling. Findings: The research findings demonstrate that job insecurity exacerbates job tension. Job tension erodes employees’ trust in organization and aggravates their propensity to leave work early and be late for work. As hypothesized, job tension mediates the effect of job insecurity on organizational trust and the abovementioned outcomes. Originality/value: This study adds to the hospitality literature by assessing the interrelationships of job insecurity, job tension, organizational trust and nonattendance intentions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ihr-11-2021-0070

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals exposed to high job stress-such as toxic leadership or excessive workload-experience emotional and physical resource depletion, increasing strain and workplace bullying.

    “Resources (JD-R) model, individuals exposed to high job stress—such as toxic leadership or excessive workload—experience emotional and physical resource depletion, increasing strain and workplace bullying [48].”

    From Narcissistic leadership, workplace bullying, turnover intention, and creative performance: a study of nurses (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    The ‘Job tension as a mediator between job insecurity and proclivity to display nonattendance intentions’ section says high job demands, including work overload, deplete emotional and physical resources and heighten strain. The paper discusses job insecurity and nonattendance intentions as outcomes, but does not identify toxic leadership as a stressor or say resource depletion increases workplace bullying; bullying appears only in a reference title. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Narcissistic leadership, identified as a job stressor, contributes to the depletion of nurses' energy and emotional and physical resources, consequently escalating the occurrence of workplace bullying as a manifestation of work-related strain.

    “Drawing on the health impairment component of this model, it can be posited that narcissistic leadership, identified as a job stressor, contributes to the depletion of nurses’ energy and emotional and physical resources, consequently escalating the occurrence of workplace bullying as a manifestation of work-related strain [48].”

    From Narcissistic leadership, workplace bullying, turnover intention, and creative performance: a study of nurses (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karatepe, O. M., Okumus, F., & Saydam, M. B.
Affiliations
Eastern Mediterranean University (CY)
Corresponding author
Karatepe, Osman M.
Venue
International Hospitality Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2022-08-09
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
101-118
ISSN
2516-8142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297682360
Cited by
25
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Hospitality Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
job insecurity, hotel employees, COVID-19 pandemic, occupational stress, organizational trust, absenteeism, early departure, five-star hotels, hospitality workforce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review