Cited by 7,139Stress and Burnout ResearchResilience and Mental HealthHealth, psychology, and well-being

The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested‐Self in the Stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory

Hobfoll, Stevan E.·2001·Applied Psychology

Abstract

Conservation of Resources (COR) theory predicts that resource loss is the principal ingredient in the stress process. Resource gain, in turn, is depicted as of increasing importance in the context of loss. Because resources are also used to prevent resource loss, at each stage of the stress process people are increasingly vulnerable to negative stress sequelae, that if ongoing result in rapid and impactful loss spirals. COR theory is seen as an alternative to appraisal‐based stress theories because it relies more centrally on the objective and culturally construed nature of the environment in determining the stress process, rather than the individual’s personal construel. COR theory has been successfully employed in predicting a range of stress outcomes in organisational settings, health contexts, following traumatic stress, and in the face of everyday stressors. Recent advances in understanding the biological, cognitive, and social bases of stress responding are seen as consistent with the original formulation of COR theory, but call for envisioning of COR theory and the stress process within a more collectivist backdrop than was first posited. The role of both resource losses and gains in predicting positive stress outcomes is also considered. Finally, the limitations and applications of COR theory are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1464-0597.00062

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who experience resource depletion may adopt self-defense strategies to preserve their remaining resources.

    “According to the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, individuals who experience resource depletion may adopt self-defense strategies to preserve their remaining resources [35].”
  • According to the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, nurses subjected to high job demands such as negative or unsupportive leadership may experience strain that can lead to workplace bullying.

    “The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model suggests that when nurses are subjected to high job demands—such as working under a negative or unsupportive leadership style—they may experience strain that can lead to counterproductive behaviors such as workplace bullying (refer to 35).”
  • Workplace stress arises when individuals confront the potential loss of resources, experience resource depletion, and allocate resources without achieving the anticipated returns.

    “Workplace stress arises when individuals (a) confront the potential loss of resources, (b) experience resource depletion, and (c) allocate resources without achieving the anticipated returns [35].”
  • Under conditions of low career adaptability, the meta-capacities required to externalize beliefs into high engagement are insufficient, thereby limiting the conversion efficiency of the beliefs-work engagement link.

    “Conservation of Resources Theory (Hobfoll, 2001) further predicts that under conditions of low career adaptability, the meta-capacities required to externalize beliefs into high engagement are insufficient, thereby limiting the conversion efficiency of the beliefs–work engagement link (Haenggli and Hirschi, 2020)”
  • Teaching beliefs constitute a guiding personal resource, whereas career adaptability is a "meta-resource" that governs the capacity to mobilize resources.

    “teaching beliefs constitute a guiding personal resource, whereas career adaptability is a “meta-resource” that governs the capacity to mobilize resources”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobfoll, S. E.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hobfoll, Stevan E.
Venue
Applied Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
337-421
ISSN
  • 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0597
OpenAlex
W2048385562
Cited by
7,139
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 852 · 2025: 706 · 2024: 623 · 2023: 638 · 2022: 666 · 2021: 612 · 2020: 446 · 2019: 405 · 2018: 326 · 2017: 295 · 2016: 258 · 2015: 225 · 2014: 228 · 2013: 169 · 2012: 152
FWCI
25.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
conservation of resources theory, stress process, resource loss, resource gain, culture, community, collectivism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review